While Rex shouldn't be giving his opponents insight for how to play against us, and in this regard he has been bad (ie, he distributed the defensive playbook rather liberally), Rex didn't help the Chiefs and the author of the article is a moronic tool who apparently has to resort to kicking a man while he's down to get noticed. Vick has been in the league for 12 years. Do you really think that teams are not prepared to face him? What about the increasing number of scrambling qbs that teams have to face each year? And what about the Chiefs? They gave up 138 points in 8 games! They did this while facing the patriots, Broncos, and Chargers. Do you think the staff wastes its time reading online publications to devise strategy? I will give you the ultimate strategy to stopping Vick. Get him to sign with the Jets.
I wonder if Rex has any insight in stopping the QB'S we face the rest of the season? He hasn't shown much ability in do it the last few weeks.
Wit, intellect, logic, the entire gamut. The irrationality of your post is embarrassing. To attempt to claim defending a specific action of Rex is making an excuse for Rex's failure as a coach is truly something special of the short bus kind.
Ouch, hit again! Your seemingly never ending supply of high brow insults continues to deflate my ego. Please, educate me some more.
How about you educate me on how you thought you were making a logical connection? You thought you were being so smart in your retort it should be an easy position to defend. Or more likely you are simply deflecting with snarky comments to hopefully distract from the fact that your asinine post has unequivocally shown to be garbage and you have no real defense for the stupidity that post reveals. You will save more face admitting you over reacted in your desperation to criticize Rex and your response attempted to make a non-existent and illogical connection of two completely unconnected positions because you are the very hysterical, irrational whiner I was addressing.
