Wildcard Weekend Thread

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by soxxx, Jan 2, 2014.

  1. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    Uhh is this a catch? By NFL rule I think no, since you have to maintain possession through the ground
     
  2. deerow84

    deerow84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,814
    Likes Received:
    421
    I wish we had an AJ Green.
     
  3. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    looks incomplete to me
     
  4. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    But what if they rule forward progress was stopped, hence the clock running. Can they then rule he didn't complete the process, even though they ruled the clock is running?
     
  5. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    either way it's lame they ran the clock

    if it's a catch it should stop if you land out of bounds (although apparently that's not the rule)

    if it's incomplete it stops the clock
     
  6. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    OHHHH his foot is out before he loses possession
     
  7. Section 336

    Section 336 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    7,055
    Likes Received:
    5,499
    Should be no catch
     
  8. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    Does that mean you don't need possession to the ground? The NFL made a "catch" such a complicated thing
     
  9. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    they didn't blow the play dead as in his forward progress was stopped

    he caught it, was hit and landed out of bounds

    I think it's ridiculous to say the clock should run
     
  10. statjeff22

    statjeff22 2008 Green Guy "Most Knowledgeable" Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    27,097
    Likes Received:
    7,046
    It's probably incomplete, thanks to that ridiculous rule. I'm amazed that they didn't change the rule back when the Calvin Johnson TD was taken away.
     
  11. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    pretty sure you need possession to the ground regardless
     
  12. The 1985er

    The 1985er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    I'm surprised they upheld that.
     
  13. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    CIN has to spike it quickly!
     
  14. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    Chargers have to be pleased with this first half though. I think the goal of these road playoff games as the underdog is to just extend the game into the second half and win it when you can win it. You cant win it in the first half but you can certainly lose it. The Chargers certainly have not lost the game in this first half.
     
  15. statjeff22

    statjeff22 2008 Green Guy "Most Knowledgeable" Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    27,097
    Likes Received:
    7,046
    Well, I'll give them credit - since forward progress was over letting go of the ball didn't matter. It still is a stupid rule.
     
  16. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    :lol:

    WTF

    forward progress stopped so it's a catch and he doesn't need to maintain possession?

    bizarre
     
  17. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    nugent nails it

    very tight window because it had to be snapped immediately
     
  18. Section 336

    Section 336 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    7,055
    Likes Received:
    5,499
    I was swear sometimes its like they make this stuff up as they go along "forward progress was stopped"
     
  19. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    I don't think forward progress should have been called there.
    That means by NFL rule, incomplete.

    Soo the NFL in my opinion made a mistake then had to leave it catch because of that mistake
     
  20. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    I agree with you on all points.

    If I were writing the rules, that would be a catch and he went out of bounds to stop the clock.

    Since we're going by the NFL's rules, I think that should've been an incomplete pass.

    Forward progress wasn't stopped. He caught it and got knocked out of bounds. Forward progress stopped is applied to plays where a guy is struggling and four guys have a hold of him and are driving him backwards, not here.
     

Share This Page