because you are making the biggest mistake anyone can while discussing a game. focusing on only stats without context. sauce "only" let up 30 yards because the whole D was being picked apart equally. sauce's 2 mistakes were bigger then wilsons mistakes too. zach threw 3 INts but 2 were desperation time when the game was over. he only made the 1 mistake when the game was still winnable. sauce's dropped pick 6 was a 14 point swing in a close game. his missed tackle allowed a drive to continue that should have ended and cost us points when it was a close game. Zach on the other hand had no time to play his part due to the o-line. Brown was abused by parsons every play. hackett refused to give him TE help. zachs poor numbers were more on hackett, brown, and garbage time desperation. he hid a dart to GW to make it a 10-7 game and then sauce ruined what could have swung the whole game for us at a pivotal time. At the end of the day, the end score was way more caused by sauce's mistakes and hacketts and browns then it was zach. I can't even put zach as a top 10 reason we lost that game so why should he be a dud? I can put sauce in that category though. Zach sure wasn't a stud, nobody is saying that but you can't call him a dud either. dak would have looked just as bad if not worse in zachs shoes
