Trading up is../Trade down...MERGED

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Fakterx, Mar 30, 2006.

  1. Attackett

    Attackett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    5,512
    Collins was out AFTER Manning was drafted and THEN Warner was signed AFTER Collins was released.. Bottomline is Accorsi felt like he needed to get his QB of the future when he was in position to do so. He would have went for Manning regardless if he signed McKensie in FA..There QB situation was no worse than ours is now. Ramsey is not the answer and Penny will never be the same.. Get your Qb when you get the chance, we will have plenty of chances to upgrade the OL throughout the rest of the draft. And I'll say it again, Gallery was every bit the prospect DBrick is now, only BETTER. His run blocking skills were as highly regarded as his pass blocking skills. If we pass on the chance to get a franchise QB for DBRick we will regret it for the rest of our lives..
     
  2. The Lord

    The Lord Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,572
    Likes Received:
    0
    haha...(sarcasm)
     
  3. Green Guy

    Green Guy New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think this thread should be MERGED!
     
  4. Coach K

    Coach K New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,214
    Likes Received:
    0
    how about this we could all sugarcoat our arguments as much as we want. this thread should really be a Leinart/Bush/Super Mario thread.......cuz those are the only 3 players i would see the Jets trading up to take.

    forget the Giants forget the Raiders this would just be us debating whether or not Leinart (since we are talking QB's) is worth trading up for?

    and we have about 90 million other threads like this.

    lets just say this, Trading up is NOT a bad idea...........but not a risk I'd want to take when I could get more quality players in the 1st 2 rds. I would rather have a #4 pick on my team and a #29 pick instead of just #1 or 2

    sure make your move for 1 QB, I'd like to fill multiple holes this yr. you can trade the draft next yr for another prospect.
     
  5. James Hasty

    James Hasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    15,975
    Likes Received:
    5,254
    Gallery will start at left tackle for the Raiders this year. Without the zone blocking scheme the Raiders used last year he will get a chance to show how good he can be.

    While he got off to a slow start I think Gallery has just as much chance to succeed as Eli Manning or Philip Rivers. I don't think either QB has convinced me that trading up for a QB is the way to go.
     
  6. Attackett

    Attackett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    5,512
    I think Manning has shown enough in his limited time in the NFL to prove that Accorsi made by far the right decision, no matter what Gallery does with the rest of his NFL career, which at this point has been a major dissapointment..
     
  7. kbgreen

    kbgreen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,659
    Likes Received:
    32

    You made me remember my favorite headline of all time! One of those trashy papers actually used this headline to report John Denver's death.

    "Denver's nuggets over golden state"

    I was in the line at the supermarket and lost it!
     
  8. Royal Tee

    Royal Tee Girls juss wanna have fun
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    21,809
    Likes Received:
    4,336
    Ramsey IS NOT THE ANSWER PEOPLE!!!!

    We must Grab our Future QB if Not Future RB NOW!

    Either way you look at it,IF We draft a Rookie QB he will NOT be starting and will be 3rd string so we NEED a Solid 1-2. That's the only role Ramsey plays here.
     
  9. EvilClownFace

    EvilClownFace New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    0
    You don't know that Ramsey isn't the answer. For all we know he could end up having a better career (when all is said and done) than any QB coming out in this draft.

    Give the guy a shot this year, and if he's not the answer, address the situation in the draft next season. If the guy is as bad as many think he is then we're CERTAIN to have a top 5 pick again.

    Hell I don't care if we draft a guy in the later rounds this year. If we took either Cutler or Lienart at 4 (if he's still there), I can't say I'd be happy, but I would learn to live with it.

    I just don't think we should trade up and give up a day 1 pick in a draft this deep. We're in a great spot right now.
     
  10. Royal Tee

    Royal Tee Girls juss wanna have fun
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    21,809
    Likes Received:
    4,336
    There is No Leinart, No Vince Young, No reggie Bush Next year.
    If you can get any one of those players by adding a bottom of the round pick YOU DO IT.

    Once the top 3 is over the drop off is significant then 10-12 and after that is a crap shoot.

    "Learn to Live with it"? That's what JETS fans have been doing for over 35years now!!
    No Thanks, Give me a New Franchise player!!!
     
  11. James Hasty

    James Hasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    15,975
    Likes Received:
    5,254
    Accorsi did not make the right decision. Manning did very poorly in the playoffs. In time he should get better but Eli has to show a lot more to justify being taken at # 1.

    Rothlisberger would have been a better choice than Eli IMHO. Other first rounders such as Vilma and Roy Williams look very good as well.
     
    #51 James Hasty, Mar 31, 2006
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2006
  12. Jets41815162342

    Jets41815162342 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    547
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trade up for Bush only

    Unless we're trading up for Bush I don't think it would be a good idea.

    Trading up from the #4 spot for any type of lineman. Stay off the crack it's bad for you.

    Trading up for a true "Franchise QB" would be reasonable but guess what ... THERE ARE NONE ...

    Leinhart ... Average arm strength ...don't kid yourself, natural arm strength in the NFL is a HUGE factor. He can make all the throws...whatever. Also don't forget the fact he is a party boy, One STD from Paris or Tara Reid and he'll fall apart.
    Cutler ... would be a great late first or 2nd round pick .. too many questions to be considered a true Franchise QB
    Young ... Wonderlic score + Poor mechanics + Not in a pro-style system - Can you say PROJECT boys and girls

    Bush is a legit franchise player, trading up for him would be reasonable but at what cost?
     
  13. EvilClownFace

    EvilClownFace New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    0
    I see what you're saying and your point is very valid.

    I guess we differ because I haven't lived through 35 years of suffering (i'm 29).

    I just really like the position we're in. Yes, Leinart could be the next BIG qb. But IMO (like I said) there's no guarentee that he'll be any better in the NFL than Ramsey has been (or will be).

    I won't even get into Vince Young because IMO he's a poor man's Dante Culpepper. Again, he may become a great QB, but I have my doubts.

    At this point though there is no wrong or right answer. We just have to sit back, watch things unfold, and see how they turn out.

    We can't live in the past though. I know this franchise has had more than it's share of bad moments (for lack of a better phrase), but I really feel like we're on the right path with this new no nonesense regime.

    From what I've seen so far these guys mean business. Lets hope this all translates to good quality football on the gridiron.
     
  14. Royal Tee

    Royal Tee Girls juss wanna have fun
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    21,809
    Likes Received:
    4,336
    That's funny, I said the same thing about Young and when you think about it, Culpepper was a pretty good QB (Pre-Injury)

    And you are 100% right, I have been crying on this board because the lack of balls our FO and CS had.
    Now, I like what I'm seeing (although we could've gotten more for Abe :wink: j/k)

    But the fact is, when you have a chance to get guys who did great things and look superior than the avg. for a measly unproven extra low round Draft pick you do it.
    I think people put way too much stock in some of these unproven players and yes, They are ALL unproven but these guys look more like Locks that the rest of the pack.
     
  15. Imagesrdecieving

    Imagesrdecieving Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    902
    I wouldn't trade up. If you stay pat you are guarenteed to have either Leinart, Super Mario, or Young fall to #4. All would be great selections IMO.To me trading up is equivalent to overpaying in free agency.
     
  16. EvilClownFace

    EvilClownFace New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    0
    The way I see it. If you've got a chance to possibly land a Mario Williams /AJ Hawk and a Nick Mangold / Marcus Mcneil, you have to jump at it. ( i know Mangold and Mcnail may be reaches at 29 but you never know).

    Like is said, there's no right or wrong answer here. We all have the same goal in mind anyway. Bringing home the Lombardi trophy.

    Some of us are just a hell of a lot more sensible and realistic than others (present company excluded :up: ).
     
    #56 EvilClownFace, Mar 31, 2006
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2006
  17. We have 5 picks on day 1. That gives us the opportunity to sit at some very good spots and pick the BPA. We don't need to acquire anymore picks. Sit where we are at and stick to our board.
     
  18. James Hasty

    James Hasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    15,975
    Likes Received:
    5,254
    You are forgetting that if we use # 4 to get more picks we can move up from our other spots and still end up with 5 or 6 day one picks. Value is the key to trading up or down. I just don't see much value in moving from # 4. Moving up from # 35 or # 67 is a whole different story.
     
  19. Royal Tee

    Royal Tee Girls juss wanna have fun
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    21,809
    Likes Received:
    4,336
    Thanks .

    Being that it's a team game haveing 5 solid players is more valuable than havin1 great player. So yes, if you can aquire all those players do it.
    But,
    The chances of that are really slim.
    Also, It's not like we'd be giving up the farm to get anyone of the elite players. If we were I'd be whole -heartedly against it.
    But giving up an extra pick to get one of em? I have no problem with it.
     
  20. Royal Tee

    Royal Tee Girls juss wanna have fun
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    21,809
    Likes Received:
    4,336
    Also, Don't get me wrong.
    I was one of the first to point out that I believed Ramsey got a raw deal w/the Foreskins. All the coaches, The lack of an O-line etc..

    But to me he still isnt a franchise QB.
    I hope I'm wrong but I'd still try and Get that via the draft. If not we need a franchise RB
     

Share This Page