i agree with everything except the way you said we already have a number 1 receiver in coles almost sounded as if you were comparing the two....football-wise,obviously coles couldnt hold T.O's underwear.....and im not so sure cles is even a number one....but the rest youre right on
Coles is definitely a #1 WR. No, he's not on the same level as TO talent wise, but there are very few WR's that are.
No I am not comparing the two, but Coles is a #1 not as good as TO but a #1 still, he is capable of huge numbers if there is a QB that can get him the ball
coles dropped many passes this season did not run complete routes was afraid to go over the middle and had a very poor yac yards after catch stat coles is nowhere near the calibre of T.O
Coles is a #1 reciever on the New York Jets most teams he would be a 2 or a 3. Coles cannot carry T.Os dirty jock.
Coles would be a #1 on a lot of teams. There isn't a team in the entire NFL in which Coles would be the #3 WR, except for MAYBE St. Louis and Indianapolis. He's a starter in this league, that is unquestionable.
Detroit - He would be #1 or #2. Pittsburgh - #2 Oakland - #2, he could beat out Porter no doubt. Indianapolis - I already said he might not start there, but they really don't have WR ranks there. Giants - #2 Bengals - #2, but would be a nice competition between him and TJ. Cowboys - Probably #2, since Glenn is a Parcells favorite and a little more explosive. So, like I said, he is unquestionably a starting WR in the NFL.
WRONG, Burress has been a #2 for years, Coles is better than him although that is debatable, and Glenn and Keyshawn are both #2's Dallas wished they had Coles as a bonafide #1.
Yes he is a starter but as far as im concerned we should have kept Moss.Coles is no T.0 no way no how.How can you expect any qb to come in here and be succesful when we have a very weak corp of wide recievers.Now add T.O and you have vastly improved your offense.Statistics dont lie. We had 7 recieving tds last year T.O had 8 in what 7 games. I rest my case.
First off Moss didn't fit our offense, second and I will bold it for you, we don't have the money to pay him
Find me one post on here(by a poster here for more than a few days) that says that. It'll be extra difficult, since you only have five days worth of posts to work with.
