I tend to look at Time of Possessin as a more accurate indicator. Raiders were third worse and Yet were 12 in total plays- defense must have been doing something right to limit amount of plays. Again you obviously didn't see any raiders games, so your throwing crap out there and hoping something sticks. Go to NFL.com Click on games Play by play and see If your theory correct. Taking from raider board- article from CnnSI. "Though the statistics suggest the Raiders struggled versus the run, they only gave up an average of four yards per carry despite facing more carries than any other team in the league, and most of those extra carries were the result of being on the field more because the Oakland offense was on it less." http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/bucky_brooks/07/05/tc.preview.afc.west/1.html
I can?t see any proper reason, y time of possesion is a better indicator than the number of plays. Could you pls explain that to me?
Teams were just milking the clock against them because they had absolutely no fear that the Raiders were going to score on them.
here ill play your game again time for excuses on the coaching staff and scheme new staff, new system, new hc. it takes time blah blah blah. just like your other raider nation sermons. all this trash you talk proves nothing because even if Vilma doesnt remain a star as a Jet, he will be one somewhere else. let me make all these situational arguments for morrisons stats too. your division is nothing but run heavy teams, LT, LJ, and the Broncos. pretty easy to make tackles if your even a decent MLB. just as you insinuate Vilma is right? jet fans call him a genius, yes. much like you have already crowned kiffin for being the OC of a powerhouse school with top recruits in a college conference notorious for high scoring and weak defense. why else is he a genius, cuz of what he did in his first yr. how did your first yr coach do? oh thats right, your teams a punchline now.
