Imagine away...! (You may want to tweet that little tidbit to Spicer, he's looking for any kind of lifeline.)
Also, in watching all the coverage and support for this women's march you'd think that women aren't going to be allowed to leave their houses once Trump is in the White House for a couple weeks. I've never seen anything like it. What exactly was the point? Talking about how 'America isn't defined by the President. WE are America.' And all the stuff they were saying today. I didn't get it. There were hundreds of thousands of women there that work high paying jobs in corporate America yet they are somehow oppressed? Just like everyone else in America that isn't a straight white male (who has become public enemy #1 and automatically some sort of racist/sexist/bigoted pig). Excuse me if this is viewed as desensitized but can someone explain to me what they were protested and ranting about other than Planned Parenthood? On the topic of non-profits, the majority of the funds are not used for the actual cause of a non-profit. I'm as pro-choice as it gets, but to act like cutting funding to PP means that there will not be legal abortions in the country seems like a radical viewpoint.
They were protesting the new president getting caught on tape talking about wanting to fuck some celebrity reporter chick. They were also protesting the fact that they just got robbed of a female president. There was nothing else they were actually protesting, although they'd probably say different, and be lying.
Seems legitimate. Can we have a man's march? The funniest part about the people who smashed the Starbucks window is that Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz (just stepped down) is an extremely liberal person to my recollection. There's no way he was a Trump supporter, so it was nice to see those morons that did that destroy a business that supported their cause.
Starbucks needs to introduce a new size of coffee. Kind of like a big cardboard bucket that costs 40 bucks, the Trump size. Spray a whole can of whipped cream on top and shower the customer with sugar packets. Fucking thing would be huge.
Way to completely miss the point of someone making a thread calling a large group dunces and then acting like a dunce himself just making shit up. I don't care how little the inauguration crowd was, anyone that would go to an inauguration is a moron in my book. "Yeah, lets celebrate someone who isn't going to do anything for us." That goes for all Presidents not just the current one. And most of the Trump Inauguration crowd came in their stretch limos, mass transit is for the peasants.
Well it's a huge contradiction considering over 50% of white females voted for Trump. I'm baffled by it, but I will never bring that fact up in public.
I'm loving the MSM using the size of the inauguration crowd as a therapy puppy. Seriously, who gives fuck. Trump supporters turned out the day it really mattered, Election Day. Nice to see yesterdays vent sessions weren't riots like the previous two days. Hopefully everyone has it out of their system now. Now get back in the kitchen and fetch me a sandwich.
agree its comical - the same networks that continually failed to showcase the sparse crowds at many a clinton rally....... i consider myself a stealth realist - not necessarily a trump style supporter but a believer in several of his attempted messages - regardless of how he delivers them. i can see through that crap. unfortunately many a young folk don't have that capacity, yet. and these so called hollywood/media celebrities make their money and fame regardless of who sits in the chair but they continue to chirp without facts and knowledge.
He talked about sexually assaulting women. Say he can just force himself on them because he's famous. They were marching against a sexist pig who advocates sexual assault. Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
That's not what he said. And that isn't just bias talking. Even Clinton supporting Dave Chapelle knew what he was talking about-- Fucking groupies who are looking for sexual encounters with celebrities. Because you are too stupid to comprehend what he actually said: "And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything." "When you are star" which references he's talking about the role of celebrity in the situation. "They let you do it..." which is referencing consent. Consent by women who want sexual encounters with celebrities. Pretty fucking straight forward, unless you are a moron who can't comprehend very simple concepts, have lived a sheltered life and have never heard of celebrity groupies, or are simply a liar. Which are you?
I responded to your questioning of Park Service crowd estimates with real figures from a different agency. Nobody is missing the point and you're just trying to defer because the statistics don't meet your agenda. Why someone started this topic a couple of months ago is totally immaterial. Do you believe it is proper for the current administration to lie about the crowds? Shouldn't they have more important things to deal with?
With all due respect, can you explain what "winning for America" means? How you define "real Americans"? What an "anti-American globalist" is?
You need to study up a little more and do some research. Do you understand what conservative and liberal mean? Do you understand how political parties have changed over the course of US history? A conservative is not a Republican and a liberal is not a Democrat. Conservatism is the inclination in politics to maintain the existing or traditional order. It is a political philosophy or attitude that emphasizes respect for traditional institutions and opposes the attempt to achieve social change through legislation or publicly funded programs It is a political philosophy advocating the preservation of the best of the established order in society and opposing radical change Liberalism is a political and social philosophy advocating individual freedom, representational forms of government, progress and reform, and protection of civil liberties. So, let's talk the Civl War era. Democrats were the party of slavery and, as a result, were seeking to maintain the traditional order and institutions. They were the conservatives of that era. Republicans, by opposing slavery, were advocating for freedom and civil liberties. The Republicans were the liberals of that era. As issues changed, so have the parties. FDR Democrats were liberal from an economic standpoint, seeking changes from the established institutions that led to the Depression. In the 1960s, Southern Democrats were more conservative, opposing civil rights for minorities. When the Democrats became more aligned with the civil rights movement and the anti-Vietnam war movement, the conservatives in the South and West shifted their allegiance to the Republican Party. This and other issues led to a shift where Democrats (in the 70s through today) are more liberal while Republicans are more conservative. Many conservative groups now support the Republican party - such as the religious right. What would be most surprising to Conservative Republicans is that our Founding Fathers, who Conservatives love to quote and honor, were not just liberal, but were radicals. The conservatives of the Revolutionary War era were tories through and through. Fox News, Sean Hannity, and the conservatives of today would be the Tory Loyalists of that era and would be critical of the violent protests and uprisings and "the horror" or revolution and separation from the King and England. By the way, the most influential liberal and radical "person" who ever walked the earth was Jesus.
My agenda? What exactly is my agenda? I think Trump is a dipshit, just not as much of a dipshit as Clinton, that is about as far as my Trump agenda goes. You actually missed the point by a mile but keep thinking you know everything. I even clarified it for you in my second post about it. This is what he said and what I put in bold, italics and larger font, how you could miss the point is amazing or should I say, avoided the point to further your agenda. My response As far as whether I think it is ok for anyone to lie about the crowds, I thought I made that crystal clear also. It's so funny when someone like you thinks their party is working for them, like when Obama promised no pork barrel spending, “both parties in Congress should know this. If a bill comes to my desk with earmarks in it, I will veto it. I will veto it.”. That billion dollar destroyer the military didn't even want but sailed through last year is just one of the many that should have been vetoed according to his promise. Or when Obama told the Russian President “This is my last election, After my election, I have more flexibility.”. Basically letting everyone know, what I say to get elected doesn't matter.
TurdHusker doesn't have a clue, he cobbles together bits and pieces from what others say that he thinks sound cool, then adds a few of his own words to make it completely incomprehensible.
