That you feel you have to post that tells me you don't get laid at all. Keep posting your fantasies though if it makes you feel better about yourself.
Your lack of intelligence shows again since I didn't ask you anything. Can you not figure out the difference between a statement and a question?
It's hard to tell if she's actually 19, but nyjetsmets89 was telling the truth about being out with a lady last night not being a hypocritical, intolerant progressive. https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=794766540661243&id=423006854503882
Ok, I'll play. But, my participation is conditional on two prerequisites: 1) Please define, in clear and explicit terms, what you mean by "Russia's intervention in the election." 2) Please cite specific, unbiased, independently corroborated evidence for (1)
Specific, unbiased, independently corroborated evidence is outdated. If Twitter's good enough for Trump, it's certainly good enough for you. Or do you think you're too good for Twitter?
It seems to me that liberals are infatuated with the notion that Russia intervened with the election results (the implication being that Russia's actions, in and of themselves, propelled Trump to victory) because this belief conveniently takes the democratic party off the hook for the monumentally poor decision to nominate (or, some would argue, coronate) a lifelong politician and political insider to go up against a populist political outsider, after 8 years of Obama. On a more fundamental level, the "blame Russia" theory preserves the fantasy that the American people would never actually vote for someone like Trump without being duped, and more specifically, that the phony, politically correct, shameful identity politics espoused by liberals (and the corresponding puppet national media) wasn't widely and resoundingly rejected.
I'm 28 so I've only been able to vote in three presidential elections. Obama, Obama, Clinton 2008 - McCain was a nut. Plus he picked Palin is belongs in an insane asylum, not the White House. Really, McCain wanted to just keep things as they were going and things were going downhill so I couldn't vote for that. 2012 - Romney is a stuck-up twat who can't relate to the majority of Americans. It just felt like he was constantly talking down to the middle class. 2016 - Clinton because Trump is insane. As for state and local elections, most of my choices have been Republican. NJ Republicans are liberal compared to the national crazy that is the Republican party. They actually care about helping the people. Democrats in NJ tend to be anti-bipartisan and want to accomplish batshit crazy stuff.
Bush- didn't vote- didn't vote-trump Probabaly should have voted McCain but the palin Vp pick was a bad sign. I liked Obama during the first term. He lost me somewhere in the 2nd term. Iran deal was trash, Berghdahl style. Also, love how liberals ignore the massive arms dealer Obama has been. Talk about a war hawk.
Hmmm...no one wants to address Mattis leaving behind the Green Berets, instead, they'd rather post over it with a catfight. But there's always more: "Alec Baldwin was back on "Saturday Night Live" this week to mock Donald Trump's love of tweeting, and the real president-elect hopped on his favorite social media platform during the show to let Baldwin know he wasn't laughing. The show's cold open featured Baldwin's Trump at a security briefing in which he repeatedly loses focus and turns to his phone instead. "I just retweeted the best tweet. I mean, wow, what a great, smart tweet," Baldwin as Trump says after sharing a post by a 16-year-old California high schooler named Seth. "He really did do this," Kate McKinnon's Kellyanne Conway says to camera. And, yes, in fact Trump really did. [http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...-california-boy-tirade-cnn-article-1.2891267] "Mr. Trump, please stop retweeting all these random, real people. You're not getting any work done," an adviser pleads in the sketch. "There is a reason actually that Donald tweets so much," McKinnon's Conway explains. "He does it to distract the media from his business conflicts and all the very scary people in his cabinet." "Actually, that's not why I do it," Trump rebukes. "I do it because my brain is bad." About an hour after Baldwin's Trump took to Twitter on "SNL," Trump himself fired off a tweet calling the show "unwatchable"and "totally biased." He also said Baldwin's portrayal of him "just can't get any worse." Just tried watching Saturday Night Live - unwatchable! Totally biased, not funny and the Baldwin impersonation just can't get any worse. Sad — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 4, 2016 Baldwin responded by retweeting Trump's criticism from both of his verified Twitter accounts — one personal and one in the name of his foundation. The actor also provided Trump with a solution: "Release your tax returns and I'll stop. Ha." ...@realDonaldTrump Release your tax returns and I'll stop. Ha — ABFoundation (@ABFalecbaldwin) December 4, 2016" Ron
Trump is such a baby on Twitter. If you don't like Baldwin making fun of you, too bad. Suck it up Mr. President.
Agree. You have to take that stuff in stride. He's sooooo thin-skinned. That, to me, is one of his biggest weaknesses.
Russia fully has admitted to planting fake news stories throughout the election to discredit Clinton and help Trump. And the Republicans ate that shit up. Stories that failed the bullshit test when you say "Is this too good to be true?" or "This is too obnoxious to be true." But because it fit their agenda, they forwarded those stories themselves and it was stupid. It's like seeing a news story that says "Tom Brady Caught Handing Ref Money on Field". You SHOULD just dismiss it without having to look into it because obvious bullshit is obvious. But for some reasons, when it comes to politics, it just gets accepted as fact instead.
And which stories were these? Your argument is a little thin on the specifics of the news plants and is nothing but commentary about those dern dumb 'publicans who fell for the stories of which you conveniently fail to actually provide.
