The 4th and 2 call: why didn't we attempt a FG?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by al_toon_88, Dec 14, 2008.

  1. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,478
    Likes Received:
    896
    I agreed with the choice, I just thought the run should have gone outside or a play action pass.
     
  2. steviep

    steviep Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    2,170
    Likes Received:
    19
    It was not at the 20. It was either at the 25 or 30, I think.
     
  3. stinkyB

    stinkyB 2009 Best Avatar Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    14,281
    Likes Received:
    12,986
    Choosing to go for it was a good call, the chosen play was horrible.

    Play action anyone? :breakdance:
     
  4. GreenHornet

    GreenHornet New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,380
    Likes Received:
    1
    I didn't even know he was deactivated. That explains why I didn't see much of him. Come to think of it, I don't even see him when he is activated.

    I hope this guy pans out, but you usually are not taking on a project with the #6 pick; this stuff always seems to magnetize itself to the Jets. All that money and we have an egg to show for it. My free pass and patience is starting to wear thin.

    As far as the 4th and 2 call. I have no problem with trying it, but I think we could have called a better play. One could argue either way on whether we should have tried a FG.
     
    #44 GreenHornet, Dec 15, 2008
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2008

Share This Page