Tebow Tebow Tebow Tebow Tebow (merged several times)

Discussion in 'Tebowmania' started by RocklandJetsFan17, Mar 19, 2012.

?

Do you agree with the Jets in trading for Tebow?

  1. Yes

    277 vote(s)
    42.2%
  2. No

    379 vote(s)
    57.8%
  1. Jetaho

    Jetaho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,134
    Likes Received:
    2,287
    Agreed, but it's not a done un-deal. We can only hope.
     
  2. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,459
    Likes Received:
    858
    Yep, and that's a big problem.
     
  3. Royal Tee

    Royal Tee Girls juss wanna have fun
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    21,809
    Likes Received:
    4,336
    Since the 1st moment i've said it....

    This is a TannyWood production.

    Woody orders it, Tanny gets it done.....no matter what.
     
  4. NYJMONKEY

    NYJMONKEY Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Omg

    anyone who thinks this is a good move. is just the tebow fans. because we just got about 5 millions fake jets fans. this entire offseason is over. thats what we spent our money on. even if he does only play 4 plays a game.
    its not a smart move. I have aways supported Rex and Mike T. but this new offensive cordinator. i DONT LIKE.
     
  5. Jets n Boys

    Jets n Boys Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    0
  6. jetsons

    jetsons Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    34
    so glad you're only making 1 post about this because that made no sense whatsoever.
     
  7. Jetaho

    Jetaho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,134
    Likes Received:
    2,287
    Good post. Nailed it.
     
  8. rex2009

    rex2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    0
    Another day in the life of Haters

    As per usual the haters are spewing their venom without knowing all the facts. The trade was contingent on the Jets reviewing the contract, there was never a trade, there was an agreement in place, once they saw the contract they raised the issue, it is not about the Jets it is about Denver not disclosing the information.
     
  9. Milliner is your Mommy

    Milliner is your Mommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,455
    Likes Received:
    110
    Relax monkey. Before Denver tried to slip in the 5 million clause without the Jets noticing this trade would have cost us 1.2 million. 1.2 million for someone to play wildcat and take carries away from Greene is a good value. Its the media that comes with him thats annoying but I understand why they would want it. Not to mention the leadership/intangibles Tebow can bring to a team.
     
  10. Jets n Boys

    Jets n Boys Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    Again you show how to neglect facts and continue the retardedness when its pretty clear that Broncos asked for $5mil AFTER the trade agreement.
     
  11. Skagerrak

    Skagerrak New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bill Polian was on NFL Live and he said it's up to the team receiving the player to figure out the terms of the contract, and that they can read all the contracts on the NFL's website. But he also said that these contracts are so complicated that sometimes it's hard to figure out just what they entail.
     
  12. Denny

    Denny Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,458
    Likes Received:
    10
    No Tebow!!!
    [​IMG]
     
  13. LockDown

    LockDown Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    7
    yes,yes,yes,yes!!!!!
     
  14. jetsons

    jetsons Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    34
    go back under your rock
     
  15. ColoradoJets

    ColoradoJets Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2006
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    14
    Totally agree Nick. I'm a Jets fan living in Denver and I can't wait until the circus leaves town. You can imagine my dismay when the circus was scheduled to visit my team. Tebow is a great guy but after Sanchez's first incompletion we will start to hear the first Tebow chants. Tebow was actually behind Brady Quinn on the depth chart but because of the fans he was put in when Orton was benched. We don't need that, our QB is fragile enough as it is.
     
  16. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    What? Where the fuck did you get that gem from? Out of your ass where are you others come from? This is a standard recapture clause that can be found in any NFL contract when advances are made on future years earnings. They advanced him money for 12, 13 and 14. They want it back and the contract says they are entitled to get it back. Maybe Tannenbaum should have read it before announcing it..obviously other teams did.
     
  17. CJLang

    CJLang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    5,496
    Likes Received:
    548
    You're blaming the new OC for this move? That's hilarious.
     
  18. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    Schefter reported that Denver included the clause after they agreed in principle.
    Denver beats writer reported Jets never read contract.
    Another person on twitter said Jets read contract but missed clause first time.

    Whatever the reason, I am glad this trade did not go through. Hopefully JAX takes Tebow, and it will help them out if they get him
     
  19. Jetaho

    Jetaho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,134
    Likes Received:
    2,287
    An "agreement in principle" is not a binding contract for trade purposes. Until both sides are comfortable with all of the details, there has been no meeting of the minds and neither side is bound by anything. That is the limbo state we are currently in. It's actually kind of fun, in a perverse, alternate reality sort of way.
     
  20. nyJETS0511

    nyJETS0511 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,157
    Likes Received:
    0
    cmon son........pay the man.....its Tebow time in NY
     

Share This Page