I liked Stuckey to but Kerley has taken over his role in my opinion. Turner it least brings a strong blocking presence and is a big target which is always nice to have. I'd much rather seem them either bring Braylon back or draft a wr in the early rounds of the draft.
Agreed, Stuckey is too similar to Kerley, older, and not as good. They need to look, for size and speed and by all accounts there should be plenty of chance to get a young guy in the draft with more upside.
Exactly... dont want Stuckey because I have faith in Kerley. Holmes, Kerley, Turner, Schilenzs + someone we draft, Edwards or someone who impresses in TC and I'm happy. We don't need more than 5 WRs if we are honest about being a run first team. Schilens and Turner both got 0.5 mill guaranteed for the year, I don't think Tanny would've given it to them if he wasn't serious about them.
Exactly the last few posts. If we didn't draft Kerley last year, I wouldn't mind Stuckey as a depth guy. But we have Kerley. Stuckey isn't a deep threat, and he's not a red-zone threat, so I'll pass. At least Avery has deep speed.
In one word: No. He was bad then and is still bad now. Not everyone who leaves the jets becomes a better player just for leaving (just most of them )
Cotch finished 6th in receiving for them. They are deep, but its not as if he was beatign out a washed up Ward or a very medicore Sanders out for playing time. He still has something left, but he's not about to come in and be the deep threat so many want. Kerley looks like a good option as a #3 receiver. Cotch would be either too similar to what we want to use Holmes as or too similar to Kerley and not an upgrade at either spot at this point.
