Shocked at the huge pro-owner movement. Poll time.

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by Tyche, May 17, 2011.

?

Pro-

  1. Player

    41 vote(s)
    47.7%
  2. Owner

    24 vote(s)
    27.9%
  3. Switzerland

    21 vote(s)
    24.4%
  1. alleycat9

    alleycat9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    9,055
    Likes Received:
    1,898
    that revenue sharing they would want more of is what made the league as powerful as it is.

    i am amazed how many people are on the owners side on this issue. its kind of scary actually. i am sure one of them will be in here telling everyone how much of idiots they are any second.
     
  2. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    pro-Switzerland til I die bitches
     
  3. James Calvin

    James Calvin Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2010
    Messages:
    4,155
    Likes Received:
    0
    Switzerland is a bunch of booger eating morons.
     
  4. ConcordeChops

    ConcordeChops 2018 International Poster Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    7,045
    Likes Received:
    5,508
    +1

    Feel the Gruyère
     
  5. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    I tend to agree with the OP's assessment of the current posture of the war between the owners and the players. Before I say more about that, though, the one thing that prevents me from being completely pro-player is I don't accept at face value that the former formula for dividing revenue was fair. I just don't know that it was. It might have been, but without knowing, I have to question it.

    That aside, in terms of where we are now, how we got here, and most importantly as a fan whether or not the next season will occur, and not be disrupted, it's clear to me the owners' position and legal strategy puts that at risk more than the players. For that reason alone I think those in the middle on this issue but who consider themselves fans should be on the players' side.

    The logic supporting my conclusion is that the owners' strategy is to try to grind down the players and create disunity among them in order to get them to agree to a new CBA that is more owner friendly. But that only works if the threat of a lockout breaks up that unity. The owners are apparently fine with and have prepared for no season, while the players clearly want there to be a season. That alone is reason to support the players.

    Now if I was an owner, I might talk myself into their strategy. Recognize that while the average player is in the game for just a few years, as an owner I have a longer involvement and interest in the situation. That in turn means i can and should take the long view.

    But I am not an owner. I am a fan. I want my football this year. I don't want to wait. F anyone who does.

    Hence, I am pro player.
     
  6. Baumeister

    Baumeister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,970
    Likes Received:
    493
    I am pro-players because the owners are the ones who opted out of the current CBA. The players seemed to be fine with what they were getting. Either way just get this shit worked out and play ball. Not meeting is doing no fucking good at all. Get in a room and meet every single day until this is taken care of.
     
  7. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    So, because they started the mess by opting out and now want to fix the problem that they caused the owners are the good guys? No, fuck those rich assholes.

    Everyone involved is rich, but I'll take the side of the rich ones who put thier health on the line for my enjoyment over the even richer pricks who own the teams.
     
  8. gustoonarmy

    gustoonarmy 2006-2007 TGG.com Best International Poster of the

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,174
    Likes Received:
    160
    I favour neither side also. Who's right or who's wrong? Come the start of the football season, people won't care about either side, we the fans just want football.
    To me both sides are like squabbling children who have done something wrong, and both are trying shift the blame onto the other before the shitstorm arrives.

    BTW, I pissed myself laughing over Switzerland having to apologise for being chicken-shits during WWII the other day.
     
  9. CraigF1210

    CraigF1210 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think the owners, while they are the ones who opted out of the cba and are looking to take more, have been more straightforward

    The player's Union's decertification is a complete sham, like anyone thinks they aren't a union anymore and won't be back right after this is over is an idiot, I think they should all be sitting at a negotiation table and not in a court
     
  10. alleycat9

    alleycat9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    9,055
    Likes Received:
    1,898
    if it werent for the owners they would not have to be sitting at a negotiating table at all. once you go down the road of lockout then the gloves come off and things get dirty, i dont blame the players union one single iota for doing exactly what they did.

    the problem is that as of now it didnt work.

    listen here is the deal, every single person who is a fan of football is getting fucked in the ass by the owners, these scumbags arent going to lower ticket prices because they won the contract law with the players. they will continue to fuck everyone just as they have while proactively looking for new ways to fucke everyone including the players.

    they shouldnt be giving hte players more they should be giving YOU more. but no thats not going to happen. so fuck it i hope the players get some of that wasted money.
     
  11. alleycat9

    alleycat9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    9,055
    Likes Received:
    1,898
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=6587648

    roger goodell is going to try and pull the old hey even though we are the douchebags that put us all in this situation look at the information it just proves that the owners are hurting.... gotta love it.

    even though i realize its all being put out there for the wrong reasons i am still happy that some fans have said fuck you nfl we dont need you.
     
  12. Miamipuck

    Miamipuck New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    11,429
    Likes Received:
    1
    Someone please queue the Billy Madison clip?
     
  13. Jetzz

    Jetzz Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Messages:
    7,567
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not against the players, but they don't own the teams. They don't have to play. They want to play, but they don't have to. They just can't take the ball with them when they go home. :)
     
  14. Jetzz

    Jetzz Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Messages:
    7,567
    Likes Received:
    0
    This one?

    [YOUTUBE]5hfYJsQAhl0[/YOUTUBE]

    EDIT: Alright, who monkeyed with the settings on how to post a youtube video?? lol
     
    #34 Jetzz, May 25, 2011
    Last edited: May 26, 2011
  15. CJLang

    CJLang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    549
    Not taking sides, but in fact the Union decertified before the lockout. They ended the mediation process, dismissing out of hand the last proposal given by the owners without coming back with a counter proposal. This prompted the League to lock them out.

    The player union decided they had a better shot at getting what they want through litigation, so they chose this route. We'll see if it works.
     
  16. Miamipuck

    Miamipuck New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    11,429
    Likes Received:
    1
    That's it...........
     
  17. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    I'm shocked at the pro-anything movement. As usual in these kinds of disputes, both sides are wrong.

    Also, the player's union decertifying is a sham. I wish it would be simpler: decertify, and you're finished. You can't go back.
     
  18. CraigF1210

    CraigF1210 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    1
    Completely agree with this


    Also wanted to thank Miamipuck for all that his three posts added to the discussion and for not just being a douche
     
  19. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    Let's be real. The ONLY way the owners weren't locking out was if the players took a deal that was completely lopsided in the owners favor. AND the owners were the ones who OPTED OUT of the existing CBA when they had by far the #1 professional sport in the country.
     
  20. CJLang

    CJLang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    549
    Wouldn't it have been more productive to counter the league's proposal, which fell short financially of what the players want, but also gave the players many concessions not on the previous CBA.

    Isn't that what negotiating is? The owners knew the players weren't gonna accept the proposal, they said as much. But they expected the players union would come back with a counter. The players union was waiting for an excuse to decertify and take this to court, where they felt they had a better chance to get what they want. That's being real.
     

Share This Page