Sanchez loses a few snaps to Brunell in practice

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Murrell2878, Nov 22, 2011.

  1. Jet Rider

    Jet Rider New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    0
    Time for Sanchez to step up or get out
     
  2. Rex's Sweater Vest

    Rex's Sweater Vest Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,011
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't understand this at all. I have been a huge critic of Sanchez, but this is making no sense considering Rex also said he would never consider removing Sanchez from the starting role. So you let Brunell take snaps with the first team anyway as an empty threat?

    Does this mean Rex sees the problem in Sanchez and not with Schotty? Considering the sentiment of most on this board Rex should have kept Sanchez in and let Callahan call the plays as a message to Schotty. But no, he benched Sanchez for Brunell.

    I am getting worried about this whole situation, when Mark's contract is up do we actually give him a pay raise by extending him? He hasn't even lived up to his initial contract. And then we would presumably have to pay him MORE money? Who is going to be on the cutting room floor? I don't see how we can maintain a championship caliber team when most of our money is going to be spent on 2 players. Revis and Sanchez. I'm going to have nightmares of this FO considering letting Revis go to the highest bidder when his contract is up and sticking with the "face of the franchise" in Mark as the top dollar guy on the roster.
     
  3. njjet

    njjet Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    364
    Likes Received:
    12
    One big problem with Sanchez is no competition. I can't beleive that we entered the season without a legit back-up QB. What the hell is managment thinking? Stop trading up in the draft...lets get more players out of the draft.
     
  4. Rex's Sweater Vest

    Rex's Sweater Vest Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,011
    Likes Received:
    0
    This ^

    I think that is what they want honestly. Not to not have a good plan B, but for Mark to have no serious competition. He gets coddled so much its unbelievable. If he were playing for any other team in any other city his hide would be in jeopardy of being benched and letting the Ortons, the Carrs, and the Moores of the league get a shot. But since we have Brunell and no viable back up it keeps that type of controversy at bay and lets Mark feel like there is no added pressure to succeed. If there was a serious threat at back up QB, and this sort of controversy was brewing, I think Mark would have spent the bye in the film room rather than go camping with Brunell and O'Connell.
     
    #104 Rex's Sweater Vest, Nov 24, 2011
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2011
  5. ukilledkenny

    ukilledkenny You bastards!

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,343
    Likes Received:
    0
    I only read this page of of this thread and I know it's terrible.
     
  6. dawinner127

    dawinner127 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    12,076
    Likes Received:
    12,697
    Makes two of us.
     
  7. nyjetsrule

    nyjetsrule Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    10,379
    Likes Received:
    7
    thats what i did couldnt help but lol at this comment kenny haha
     
  8. milcus

    milcus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    3,013
    Likes Received:
    269
    Exactly. I have been saying this for months now as well. What the hell is the point of Brunell? Schotty has been around the game for a long time too, and if Sanchez has football questions, he should be able to ask Schotty (yes, I realize that I just typed that, and almost did it with a straight face). But Brunell literally adds nothing to this team, and it was blatant negligence to go into this season with him as the back-up.
     
  9. Rex's Sweater Vest

    Rex's Sweater Vest Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Listening to Mike and Mike this morning with Skip and Stephen A Smith stepping in as hosts, and they were talking about our backup quarterback situation and Stephen A was saying what I have heard others say, that we don't have a viable back up QB because the organization wants to protect Mark Sanchez's ego. It really is inexcusable that we did not make a play for Vince Young, which is what Stephen A was criticizing. We had plenty of cap room to sign him for a year as a back up, but no, we decided getting a backup QB was not necessary. And In all honesty, I agree with Stephen A Smith when he says Vince Young is a better QB than Mark Sanchez, and we would be a better team with him.
     
  10. MikeHoncho

    MikeHoncho Trolls

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2010
    Messages:
    3,018
    Likes Received:
    0
    Vince Young sucks, AND he's an asshole. Stephen A. Smith said it so obviously you know that's wrong.
     
  11. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    Its hard to make a point referencing Stephen A Smith and Skip Bayless.
     
  12. Rex's Sweater Vest

    Rex's Sweater Vest Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are you honestly going to say you disagree that we should have gone out and acquired a back up like Vince Young rather than stick with Brunell?
     
  13. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    Vince Young is terrible and seeing as how Sanchez isn't injured he would never see the field
     
  14. CJLang

    CJLang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    549
    I believed Smith 100%! He was speaking really loudly. He and Mike Irvin have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the louder you make your argument, the more credence it holds.
     
  15. alleycat9

    alleycat9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    8,976
    Likes Received:
    1,824
    stephen a smith is a dumbass, and annoying as fuck. vince young is bad but does have the ability to get wins as he proved last week.

    beyond that, the fact we dont have a backup qb is complete and total bullshit, if and probably when poor sanchez takes one of these massive hits somewhere that isnt protected we are really going to put brunell in there? thats worse than having ray lucas as your backup.

    dont shit on the guys post simply because the guy who he is using as his backup is a douche. the guys an ass but he had a point in that one.
     
  16. CJLang

    CJLang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    549
    Don't know if this is directed at me, but there is nothing in my post related to Vince Young. It was a shot at Steven A!

    As far as Young goes, I think he's more naturally talented and has a much higher upside than Sanchez. However, he lacks the drive and determination Mark possesses IMO. Sanchez seems to want it more.

    I think Young could be a top 5 QB if he ever got his head on straight, and I don't think Sanchez has a ceiling that high.
     
  17. TommyGreen

    TommyGreen Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    8,564
    Likes Received:
    2
    Whatever helps. We need him to lead the Jets on a 6 game winning streak.
     
  18. J_P_5

    J_P_5 Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    7
    Utterly ridiculous Sanchez needs protection from the subterrior foot work process "he doesn't buy enough time in the pocket for these inclusive routes"
     
  19. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm not entirely sure if this is written in English. Subterrior?
     
  20. MikeDevito

    MikeDevito Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,837
    Likes Received:
    3
    Why dont we sign David Garrard in the off season
     

Share This Page