I suggest you reread your own post...how you knocked everyone and everything and you do it again here and this time you're throwing out "fantasy stats" as your defense that mark played better than the defense did. Monday night football isn't as important as a post season game, no...but the spotlight still shines brightly, you're the only game in town and you'll be the only game talked about the next day.....it may not be a playoff game, it might not have the same ratings, but the light it does shine and if you stink you'll be the headline the next day in every sports page and if you shine you'll be the star in the headlines of ever sports page the net day.....again when the spotlight is at it's greatest Mark Sanchez was at his smallest...by your own standards of win or loss.
MNF is a joke now, SNF is the biggest primetime game and Thurs is bigger than MNF too. in the biggest games(in January) Mark played well in all of them, some better than others but we didn't lose a single postseason game b/c of our QB.
That is awesome! but how many times did they fold in big spot? at Mia, vs. Jax, vs. Atl, at Indy title game, at Den at Cle, vs. Hou, Pitt title game, etc... Great D's don't blow double digit leads in postseason , great D's get that stop in Pitt. we had a very good D that played great at times(like vs. NE and SD in the playoffs) but to be great you have to step up in big spots, our D was hit or miss w/ that. Look at what Seattle's D did last postseason, if we had Seattle's D we win the SB in 2009 and 2010.
Well at the end of the day when Mark Sanchez had something around him we were winning games. No he wasnt always pretty but a W is a W. He did what he had to do in the Playoffs to increase our chance at a superbowl appearance than any qb we have had in a long time. We had a QB.
Just look back at his performances in the playoffs vs Cincy and SD...and Indy.....and the PATRIOTS... oh, they were all on the road too? #baller
Like I said, throw the team under the bus....don't credit the defnese in the wins and blame them in the losses....
Only if you're an apologist. If the Jets had been a winner with Mark on Monday nights you'd be saying the exact opposite, btw he was a .500 QB on thursdays and well no site that i can find lists his sunday night record but I'd bet it was under 500. all you need to know about Sanchez. And I suggest you read this whole thing very carefully, yes it talks about stats..but it's all contextual and even factors in drops ....and lack of receivers...and offensive line grade... https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2012/11/14/mark-sanchez-the-real-problem/
except if you read my posts I have always said we were a D first team and they were the primary reason we made those title games. Reading, it's not that difficult.
I would never bring up something so stupid as MNF records and stats. I don't care if he was 10-0. I fell asleep reading that "article" w/ made up stats. I like to watch football games not read made up stats by non football people.
Of course you "Fell asleep" it contradicted everything you've ever said. Of course you think MNF records are stupid, as are Sunday night records (where he's also under .500), as are Thursday games...where he's barely .500. And they're stupid, as far as you're concerned, because they're all spotlight games and they're all arenas where Sanchez came up small.....At least by Won/Lost records.....which by your words are the only "stat" that matters for a QB. And I'll remind you, if you can't win in the regular season it doesn't matter how good you are in the wild card game, it doesn't matter how good you are in the Conference game, because you never get there. People look upon Jim Kelly as a guy who came up small in the big game because he lost 4 Superbowls....but at least HE got to the Superbowls....
And if they were the primary reason the team made it then any Jag could have gotten the Jets there by just not turning the ball over and doing the minimum....I rest my case, Sanchez at best is a JAG.
The reason the Jets didn't win back-to-back Super Bowls in 2009 and 2010 is that the 2000 Ravens defense wasn't part of the picture.
The fans who have insulted Sanchez through the years are comedic gold. Actually pathetic, but I try to be nice.
The fans who have blindly defended a quarterback destined to be a career backup are even funnier. And I don't try to be nice . . . just realistic.
No one ever said he was a Hall of Famer. But Kellen Clemens, Mark Brunell, Tim Tebow, Greg McElroy and Geno Smith are not as good as Mark. Just the truth. No Mark supporter would have minded if he was replaced by a better QB, but the Jets still have not offered a better one yet.
Oh cool, Mark's better than three horrible quarterbacks, one washed up one, and one unproven one. Awesome!!!!
If Mark started this year for us, we'd for sure have more then 1 win. No matter how much he sucked, he's better then anything the Jets have put out there since
If he played like he did in 2012, we'd probably be 0-6. I might as well get my baseless speculation in . . . right?
