The Eagles as a team still has only beaten 1 team with a winning record, the Colts. All of their losses have come against teams over .500. AS for when it counted in January, every game counts Junc, you have to win before January to play in January.
The wins count, I never said they didn't. What I did say was I won't be impressed until they win some games against teams over .500. (that's games plural). Nice try to sound byte it though Junc, really....watch football and try it without a six pack of beer
ohhhh now he has to win more than 1 against an over .500 team so if they win Thursday it won't count. Got it.
Butt fumble will be running through his mind come game time as he'll constantly be reminded of it. I expect him to play well with all the attention on him like he did during that last Monday night game. Egals win a close game. 31 to 28. Ima usin Tapatalkie.
Mark's graded out horribly in 2 of his 3 starts as QB of the Eagles according to PFF. Obviously the last 2 being the games. The man is still a turnover machine and misses a lot of open receivers.
Well, I mean thats your opinion. I happen to think it's a great website and a great way to judge a players overall performance throughout a game. Not just judge a whole game based off 1 or 2 throws.
I disagree, I think it can be useful but it's not THE answer. like w/ all stats they tell part of the story.
I'm not saying its the unarguable answer, but I do think it's a solid indicator and a better indicator than a pure stat line. That's all.
HE hasn't won any games against a .500 team or better, the Eagles have but "HE" hasn't. The Eagles have also lost to 3 .500 teams or better, that's a 1 and 4 record as a team and an 0-1 record for Sanchez. I've stated if the Eagles come up with at least a 3-2 record out of the next 5 games, though there is one Caveat, at least one of the wins must be against Dallas, get swept by Dallas and the Eagles playoff chances pretty much die right there, small chance of a wild card but that would mean the Eagles record would be at best 11-5 and that may very well not be enough to get in this year (thanks to a god awful NFC South). But that does kind of reflect how low you even view Sanchez. You're raising an argument because there might be an expecation that "He" has to beat more than 1 good team. Though anyone can beat any team on a given day, After all the Raiders beat the Chiefs and the Raiders are a god awful team.
So says the man who uses stats when they fit for him and dismisses them as useless when they dont' support his cause.
we get it, they win it's all b/c of the weapons and D. they lose it's all on Mark. 3-1 record, leading O no 29+ PPG. you can win a lot of games like that. Show me where I solely use stats w/o context?
Nope. you want to do that? prorate the 6 pts in the 1st half over a game and he's led his O to 27.8 PPG so essentially 28 PPG. does this make you happy?
Yes it does, thank you. I hate numbers out of context. Our numbers are a little different, though. I have Sanchez with 24 points against the Texans, 31 against the Panthers (punt and interception return accounted for 14), 12 against GB (6 averaged over two halves) and 36 against the Titans (7 via kick return). That's a 25.75 average. You can say he didn't play the full Texans game but you could also say he had a garbage time touchdown in the 4th quarter against the Panthers. Context can get confusing sometimes.
only played 3 qt against Texans. Prorate #s over full game 24/3x4=32 Carolina game D/STs scored 14 pts so total was 31 GB 6 pts in 1st half, prorated to 12 over game last week 7 pts on STs so 36 pts 32+31+12+36=111/4=27.75
