Freeman just got VJAX and Martin so whats next. Staff has had a revolving door at wr/rb with the only stable one being Calvin so what next(please dont say Nate). Mark is not that good, stop with the weapons bullshit, Eli, P Manning, Rodgers, Brees, Big Ben, Brady and so on all make the people around them better. The 5th overall pick that is making 10mil per needs to start doing the same, he needs to stop making dumb asss decisions. Its sad when Luck and RG are already better then our 4 year vet......
So what your saying is that if Sanchez led the team to the playoffs last year we would still have acquired tebow in the offseason. Is that right?
It's funny. No one eve answered my question earlier. Would you bet your money that we give Sanchez welker and Edelman and Brady takes hill and kerley and the numbers for hill and Kerley are worse than welker and Edelman?
I agree with Matt. At 75 years old I have been around as a Jet fan for a very, very, long time. I watched the whole game just shaking my head saying as Rex said when they put the camera on him, " I dont fucking believe it ". We are the laughing stock of the NFL. Please bench Sanchass and give sombody else a chance at Q-back, anybody.
Brady = argued best QB in NFL history; Sanchez = inconsistent 4th year QB with turnover issues. Brady would likely turn Kerley into a successful possession receiver. If Hill can't catch the ball, no one will make him better. Your head is so obsessed with hating Sanchez that you think Hill starts catching passes thrown to him by Brady. The truth is likely that Hill has he same type of year. So yes, Kerley becomes better in Brady's offense. With the way Sanchez has played, Welker would not be having a great year.
See that's where your not getting the question. Has nothing to do with Sanchez. My point was so called " weapons " we are lacking. Because that's what every Sanchez lover says is the problem right?
You know we are on a " all Sanchez complaints here" thread. You didn't think I was going to support him did you ?
Well the truth is that the jets DO lack weapons, regardless of what Brady would do wih the NYJ players (he can turn piss into wine). The jets have little talent, compounded by a QB who makes mental errors at inopportune times game after game. Roddy White, Julio Jones and Tony Gonzalez Miles Austin, Dez Bryant, Jason Witten, DeMarco Murray, Felix Jones VJax and Doug Martin Ray Rice Trent Richardson Even the bills and dolphins have better O talent. There is not ONE person on this offense that would help another team aside from Mangold.
You serious? The dolphins have no offensive talent. Tanehill is playing infinitely better than Sanchez and a lot of it has to do with presnap reads and not staring down his receiver.
Reggie Bush was benched for a while. He is a better back than Greene, stupid to argue otherwise. Sanchez sucks either way, but Reggie Bush > Shonn Greene
Mark would have to think about what he does with the ball and Woody would cover his losses in ticket sales. Everyone would win.
he is a better back, probably, in college, he is faster quicker and a big play maker... however he has been over 100 yards less of a back than the guy we have and has been anything but good other than 1 game very early in the year. to blame sanchez for having poor weapons and then use a guy who has lesser stats to show that tannehill has better weapons is absurd. whatever we feel about him its not like he has been head and shoulders above greene. i think he is terribly over rated and that they both suck balls.
Reggie bush is better than Greene. You can't use frequency as a comparison tool when the two backs are used at unequal rates. Bush is a better runner and receiver. Edit: Greene is a better pound For pound RB, whereas Bush is a better football player.
I don't think the players association will allow that; but Sanchez does owe Brandon Moore a new pair of game pants.
