How so ? Any time I hear the "college v. NFL" position, the argument is that defenses are bigger, faster, better in the NFL than in college. With what is being discussed, that wouldn't apply. So, yeah, it would help if you would explain why it made a difference that it was in college. If anything, I'd say being in college would make it worse as the QBs involved wouldn't be mature enough to handle it.
What a players does in college doesn't always equate to what you will get in the NFL but if you think college is irrelevant you are on another planet. There are a great many NFL scouts that would disagree with you and front offices could save a whole lot of money and time not paying attention to college players. The draft could be an hour of pulling names out of a hat. Is college ball the same as the NFL - yes it is still football - but just a whole lot harder to learn and better players to compete against.
But college stats and achievements are not more of an accurate judge of skill when a player has accumulated stats in the NFL. You can use college stats to predict how a player is going to perform and what they are going to do, but once they start playing in the NFL, it is much better to judge from those stats
Tebow will become starter. You cant fight gravity. I watched this all happen last season in Denver. There is no point in fighting it.
