Republican Nomination Thread

Of course living in your Fox News bubble, where the only question they have about her is what prison she should end up in, you just assume she is "the biggest liar of them all."

But we are talking here about policies. What policies has she proposed that are in your view, and why?, bullshit?

Try to stay on topic. I know that is hard for you. But you should make the effort.

 

You know what you know. Meaning you believe what you want to believe.

That is why you add nothing here but grade school taunts and clownish statements about politics. Hopefully you will grow up some day.

 

Oh? How does that follow?

I suppose it does cause some discomfort to realize I am talking to someone who prefers ignorance to knowledge. You know, you being a fellow citizen and all.

 

Ok, you guys really should calm down, as this is getting out of hand. I'll start issuing thread bans if this continues.

 

Thank you boss.

 

Hahahahaha. I made a communism joke about blowing Karl Marx - after you insinuated that if he was alive he would think I'm an idiot - and ever since then you've been berating me like a baby having a tantrum. Sorry I hurt your feelings big buddy.

 

Somebody needed to say it.

_

 

Except you weren't discussing their beliefs, you were discussing their rabid devotion to him as if it were unique.

This response validates exactly what I just said about you -- you either lack the ability to reason, which is why you couldn't even address what we were actually discussing, or you are so desperate to criticize Trump supporters it clouds your ability to reason. I suspect it is the former.

Beyond that, you act as if liberals don't pander to racists which makes you hypocritical in your criticism of such practices, unless you want to be equally critical of the liberal candidates who do so. Of course you won't, because as I've stated and you've validated, you're too irrational to even see your own hypocrisy which is driven simply by your desire to criticize Trump supporters.

So racism really isn't an problem for you. You just use it as an easy device to criticize people you don't like and hope nobody notices your hypocrisy. You should spend more time formulating consistent positions so your hypocrisy isn't so evident and less time coming up with cheap ad hominem attacks that don't really distract anyone from how transparently hypocritical your positions are.

 

Trump's bullshit is meaningless at this point. All he's trying to do is get elected and what he's doing is working so far.

 

I don't know who put together that cut and paste hack job, but for example I stopped watching when it said in effect that her taking money from Wall Street "proved" that she, well, it wasn't really clear what was inferred there (just as Sanders does not make it specific).

But let me ask you this - are you saying whenever a politician takes money from a corporation, that politician automatically begins working only for that corporation, and not the American people? As a binary choice?

Gee I thought conservatives thought it was perfectly okay to take money from corporations and still hold political office serving the American people. You don't think so anymore?

As for changes in policy, I have no problem with people changing their points of view based on an accumulation of contrary evidence and experience over time. Personally I am disappointed in HRC for opposing the Pacific trade bill, although I guess her position is somewhat more nuanced, meaning it needs to be renegotiated or some such thing.

Another big thing that hack job sought to make an issue of is whether there is a huge difference between being a progressive and a moderate. I don't think so. You can be both. You can be for incremental progress with reasonably achievable targets. That in fact is the core of her position I find most appealing, since given the state of our country that is the most reasonable approach and course. There is no divergence here.

My point in any event was not one you addressed - HRC does have much much more detailed policy proposals than Trump. Face it.

 

Thanks for proving my point that there is no logic or plan

You called me a hypocrite about 40 times in that rant, but you have yet to say what I am being hypocritical about. What are my positions...That I think Trump is full of shit? That I think his answer of "because my brain is great" is not an answer? That he has no real plan for what he proposes? How am I being irrational? I asked a bunch of times for anyone to give an example of what he has done for this country, and all Ive gotten back is absolutely nothing. I attack his supporters because they dont have brains to think for themselves, or they are voting for him because he is racist, or because they hate Hillary. Either way, I have yet to hear any valid point for him to be president.

 

"insinuated"

I did no such thing. You said Clinton is a socialist, and I said

"If Karl Marx was alive today, he would laugh his ass off at you."

Which meant you were wrong. Being wrong is not the same thing as being an idiot. YOU were the one who went school yard taunting. And of course you are not sorry, which is fine. Neither am I.

So, how am I a baby again?

 

Liberals pander to racists? I did not know that.

Actually I still don't, but that sure is some creative thinking.

 

No, not being able to figure out to any extent what kind of policy framework Trump would use if elected IS troubling, and here I am sure Ted Cruz would agree with me. This is more about logic and critical thinking than about right or left.

The problem with Trump is he makes shit up as he goes along, and has no analytical framework for his policies. It's all "Trust me to make America great" and belligerence and anger. There's no predictive aspect to his statements.

 

You're a baby becuz you can dish it out but you can't take it so I'm done engaging you. Go bother someone else now please.

 

And a big orange cock

 

I can confirm. he sent me a pic of it........