Penei Sewell

Discussion in 'Draft' started by BrooklynJetsFan, Dec 20, 2020.

  1. ConcordeChops

    ConcordeChops 2018 International Poster Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    6,974
    Likes Received:
    5,384
    I'm OK with him. It would be nice to be set at run protection and pass protection with Sewell in tandem with Becton. I'm not sure when we fix the QB issue though? Do we just need an average QB behind that line?
     
  2. REVISion

    REVISion Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    5,382
    Likes Received:
    9,331
    I don't think I've heard a compelling solution for having to pay either Becton/Sewell less money to play at RT. I also haven't heard a compelling argument for essentially taking a RT at #2 overall, something that is generally considered very poor value. Not saying Sewell is a bad player but taking him at #2 is a nonstarter for me. If we don't like a QB at #2 I think the obvious move is to trade down.
     
  3. Leicester Jet

    Leicester Jet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,446
    Likes Received:
    893
    Pepsiguy5, westiedog1 and stinkyB like this.
  4. Kryoptix

    Kryoptix Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2020
    Messages:
    800
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    How is it selecting a RT at 2nd overall???

    He is and would be the Jets LT and Becton would be the RT. 100% sure of that.

    How are talking about money 4 years from now? The compeling argument? How about a generational and possibly the best player at his position at 2nd overall? What more compelling argument you need? Also he would improve the run/offensive game massively! What more can we ask? Seriously.

    I am fed up with the team always rushing a proper squad building by using premium top draft capital to draft bad QB or defensive rusher that bust. We have been circling around for 3 decades can we build a proper balanced team for once. The last semi competitive Jets team at a great offensive line and running game . Doesn't that could be somehow not just coincidence?

    Everyteam in the playoff have great running and passing game! But somehow we only look at the QB like the next saviour and never look at their offensive line which are even more impressive and their rushing game.
     
    #125 Kryoptix, Jan 18, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2021
    Pepsiguy5 and RochesterJet like this.
  5. REVISion

    REVISion Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    5,382
    Likes Received:
    9,331
    If that's the case then we selected a RT at #11 in Becton, still bad value. You can't just discount the money thing. It's going to be an issue in 4 years, guaranteed. You can't just say we'll cross that bridge when we get to it.

    Would you take 25% less money at RT after you've already proven you can be a good LT? What do you tell Becton? He's going to be asking for a trade if we do that. You'd better hope we win a Super Bowl in the next 4 years because after that he's gone.
     
  6. Kryoptix

    Kryoptix Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2020
    Messages:
    800
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    There is something called a trade. You know that if you have 2 pro bowl caliber offensive tackles that your team is doing amazing well and you will easily find a taker for Becton for a significant return if that happen. Just look at the Dolphins with Tunsil.
    It is 100% better situation than to swing and a miss again on bad QB and circle again in 3 years. We could barely get a 3rd rounder for Sam Darnold now and we used so much draft capital for him. Although unsexy it would have been smarter to not make the trade up and draft the not sexy pick of Quentin Nelson and improve our o-line but we did and we are now worse than we were 3 years ago.
    Building an elite fondation and offensive line should be the #1 priority everything will improve if that happen.
     
    #127 Kryoptix, Jan 18, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2021
    Pepsiguy5 likes this.
  7. Gremlin

    Gremlin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2015
    Messages:
    955
    Likes Received:
    590
    I'd be open to taking Sewell at #2 and looking to trade Becton.

    He got chipped up a few times last season but could/should net us a high Rd1 pick+ maybe even the Cincy slot for a stab at QB or WR.
     
  8. Cromartie's_kid

    Cromartie's_kid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    605
    I think the point would be to trade one of them down the road after getting cheap dominant play out of them for a few years.
     
    ouchy likes this.
  9. SoylentGreen

    SoylentGreen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2015
    Messages:
    1,430
    Likes Received:
    1,774
    Agree + there are options. Pay 1, pay both, trade 1... there are teams paying their Qb $40m+/year... I don’t see that being the case with the Jets any time soon.

    I think when people diss Sewell at #2... they are tired of the Jets having a lack of playmakers and solid Qb play vs actually hating the idea of Sewell.

    IMO the only way you can take a Qb or WR is if they are a freak.

    Lawrence, Sewell, Parsons, Pitts are the only guys in the top 10 who fit this bill...
     
    Red Menace likes this.
  10. Gremlin

    Gremlin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2015
    Messages:
    955
    Likes Received:
    590
    I can see the 'down the road' approach but on travelling that road one of them will be the 'lesser' right tackle which either means Sewell having to make the switch after a couple of seasons working on his right-side technique or Becton having decreased trade value from not having played in the 'crucial' position in years.

    Becton is still young, cost controlled for many years and has justified his round 1 status.

    If we had to trade him right now - what would his value be?
     
  11. Cromartie's_kid

    Cromartie's_kid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    605

    A high first round pick plus?
     
  12. Pepsiguy5

    Pepsiguy5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2017
    Messages:
    2,387
    Likes Received:
    2,979
    Yeah a stud LT is "impossible" to acquire other than in the draft. If the Jets were ever fortunate enough to be in such a position 3 or 4 years from now the suitors would be lining up with fantastic offers. From my perspective Sewell should be the Jets draft pick UNLESS they get some fantastic offer to trade down. Fantastic mini-haul should probably be the #1 hope, Sewell should be the happy backup plan. And probably end up better than the mini-haul anyway in the long run if he's even 80% as good as some of the reports I'm reading about him. This guy is just a fantastic football player and as others have noted in other threads probably the least likely in the entire draft to bust which doesn't hurt either.
     
    Red Menace and ouchy like this.

Share This Page