Patriots players contract issues.

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by GMCJETS, Jul 8, 2012.

  1. TennMike

    TennMike New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    and CJLang - I keep waiting for your Avatar to move :sad:
     
  2. CJLang

    CJLang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    5,496
    Likes Received:
    548
    I love this idea that guaranteeing a player $9.5 mil for this year with the franchise tag is somehow screwing him.

    For one thing, we don't know what he is asking for. It's possible the Pats are offering him a decent contract, but he wants more than that.

    Don't be naive. He didn't show up just to be a good soldier.

    Welker knows damn well that his future earnings are based on having another big year this year. And he also knows that there is a good chance the Pats offense will be just as good without him.

    If he were to sit on the sidelines while they ran up tons of yardage and points without him, even more teams would think he is more a product of the system then a "great" receiver.

    So he really had more to lose by NOT showing up than by showing up. By showing up he gets his $$ guaranteed, and another 100 catches will get him a nice contract moving forward.

    The idea that this will show players that the Pats are cheap and nobody will want to play for them is more what rival fans hope than reality.
     
    #22 CJLang, Jul 19, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2012
  3. gopats88

    gopats88 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    5
    I'm not sure it's fair to say that they "screwed" him without knowing what they offered, and what he was demanding. Even then, it is arbitrary, and basically just amounts to a judgement call. Just because he signed his franchise tender, you can't realistically think that the Patriots were suddenly morally obligated to meet his demands, no matter what they were. In general, the idea that a franchised player is getting "screwed" seems a bit disingenuous to me. Usually they are getting paid very generously for the season, and if the players really objected to the idea as much as they portray, they would have negotiated it out of the CBA a long time ago.
     
  4. Coach K

    Coach K New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,214
    Likes Received:
    0
    i dont see what the big huff and puff is.

    Welker has only 1-2 more good years in him anyways. I usually criticize the pats for letting players walk out of egotism.

    this time they have all the right to play hardball with a WR whos had multiple leg injuries and whos game is predicated on being quick in and out of his cuts and oh wait hes 31.

    the pats have Hernandez for 2 more years and Gronk long term. they have 2 years to find a true all around WR to open the field back up for Gronk who will be schemed against with a vengeance this yr and moving forward.

    they have 1yr to bring in someone who is a solid route runner and can do some damage after the catch if they dont plan on overpaying for Welker
     
  5. Elijah

    Elijah New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    0
    Probably nothing. I don't see Stallworth making the 53 man roster, let alone replacing Welker. They also play very different roles.
     

Share This Page