Ok I'll say it

You're right. Most GMs would definitely prefer to take the less productive players.

 

Ours did.

 

We had a shot at getting DJ Moore?

 

You also have to consider that the return from trading the number 2 pick would have been significantly higher than the return we got from trading Darnold.

 

And didn't our GM basically admit he misread the Anderson market and regretted losing him?

Nah, not in this reality. He chose Davis and Crowder.

 

Nevermind

 

We could have kept Robby Anderson and instead we kept Crowder (for 75% of the cost) and then the next year signed Davis (for 133% of Anderson's money).

 

An Anderson is absolute garbage lol

3 catches for 11 yards today

 

He certainly didn't choose Anderson.

 

He's an average to below-average #2 starting wide receiver.

 

I'm still not a big Anderson guy. Not saying he sucks or anything like that. But I don't think he's a game changing player. He's a good piece to have with a good wr corp already in place to stretch the field.

 

I wouldn't even give him that this year.

He's 87th in the league in yardage and has 2 TDs

 

Can we get a Darnold update?

 

Sure. I think he's good and the talent around him is at the bottom of the league ... just like last week.

 

Yup, just like last week you can say that but it isn't true. He needs one of the best playmakers in the game to look good.

 

Darnold was just benched.

 

Must be the talent around him

 

Its a cm

its a combination of Sam being SAM (accuracy), drops and PC that is beyond bad at times... they could run the ball more and should but this AH OC keeps dialing up passing plays like 40 a game... BTW, Sam's replacement was worse if that is possible.

 

Darnold with his full array of weapons, which includes one of the best playmakers in the game, has been pure garbage today.

Before we start using the he's facing Bill excuse, I've watched the whole game (I fractured my ankle I never watch games that aren't jets anymore)... It's not Bill.