NFL Draft 2010: Day 2 Round 2-3 Discussion 6P.M. EST.

Discussion in 'Draft' started by JfaulkNYJ, Apr 23, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. vinsjets

    vinsjets Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    7,814
    Likes Received:
    0
    Seems like an odd choice...
     
  2. CatoTheElder

    CatoTheElder 2009 Comeback Poster of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Messages:
    15,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wrong order.
     
  3. Quack

    Quack New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    0
    I bet she's the greatest.
     
  4. TommyGreen

    TommyGreen Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    8,564
    Likes Received:
    2
    I figured he'd be a 3rd rounder.
     
  5. jets2884

    jets2884 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,484
    Likes Received:
    0
    pick doesnt make sense but the whole draft has not made sense lol
     
  6. nyjetsrule

    nyjetsrule Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    10,379
    Likes Received:
    7
    appears to be gerhart for the Vikes... intriguing, are they worried about AP's horrid lack of production in the last several games, and into the playoffs?

    This pick would seem to say so...

    Good Luck Toby
     
  7. TommyGreen

    TommyGreen Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    8,564
    Likes Received:
    2
    Texas A & I?
     
  8. Vorrecht

    Vorrecht Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    6,056
    Likes Received:
    0
    Crazy, crazy draft...
     
  9. JfaulkNYJ

    JfaulkNYJ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    6,967
    Likes Received:
    0
    Toby G is white how can he be a RB :shit:
     
  10. dthomas53

    dthomas53 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe they want him to play fullback for Peterson? :smile:
     
  11. Quack

    Quack New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    0
    They wouldn't call LeGarrette Blount a fullback, and he's heavier. I wonder why.
     
  12. CatoTheElder

    CatoTheElder 2009 Comeback Poster of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Messages:
    15,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    arts and industries
     
  13. MikeHoncho

    MikeHoncho Trolls

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2010
    Messages:
    3,018
    Likes Received:
    0
    Vikings should have went o-line.. their line is complete crap. No push at all for the run game.
     
  14. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Check the edit. I saw Gerhart and Houston, then noticed the Vikings on there. Two kids under three does not make for easy attention.
     
  15. Hobbes3259

    Hobbes3259 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    15,454
    Likes Received:
    393
    Means FB for Gerhart.
     
  16. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gerhart makes sense to me....a reliable runner to compliment Peterson, remember Chester Taylor is gone.
     
  17. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,483
    Likes Received:
    959

    My Top for Jets:


    Everson Griffen
    Cam Thomas
    Ricky Sapp
    John Jerry
    Vlad Ducasse
    Alex Carrington
    Carlos Dunlap
    Morgan Burnett
    Terrence Cody
     
  18. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    The only strange part is that he's really not an accomplished pass catcher.
     
  19. dthomas53

    dthomas53 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    "She said no."
     
  20. Mehl-56

    Mehl-56 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,474
    Likes Received:
    244
    Nah, they Lost Chetta Taylor
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page