Amicably! Remember that the next time you act like an idiot and you're a hop skip and a jump from Potter's Field! If Leonard Williams wasn't there to carry you over the threshold like a new bride, you'd be in jail! Them islands out there in Manhattan! Say hi to Typhoid Mary! Signed, -Mrs. championjets69
Im clearly in the minority so it’s all for not.But i cringe when i hear folks glorify Parcells going back to the 60s logo bc that was the team’s “glory days”.. so 67 through 1970..a 3 year period that yielded one super bowl is why we’re keeping the look?Cause i mean Charlie Winner,The Holtz Option offense,Rick Mirer, Herm’s clock management,the “BF” & Hackenburg happened in those unis just as well. If you like the look & dont want a change thats fair.But when its referenced as a symbol of Reveled success i have to roll my eyes. For every Celtic,Laker,Habs & Yankee club thats never rebranded theres the Seahawks,Buccaneers,Eagles, Warriors,Astros,Red sox,Capitals,Phillies hell even the stinking Giants & cheating patriots that have & in most of the cases for the better both Visually & competitively .
Historical in reference to tradition, not to what comes to mind thinking of the teams records. You dont get to pick historical based on winning percentage of a given season. And yes, the SB win is the teams historical high point. I would bet anything that the team in our current style uniform, both new and original, have more wins in them than the Joe Walton, Rich Kotite, Coslet, Blair Thomas, Lam Jones, Lageman, Haight, Mud Bowl, loser uniforms. The idea that any team is better competitively because of a rebrand is not worth discussing
Why is the plane on fire? Knowing the Jets it's actually a retarded fire-breathing dragon with flames coming out of its ass.
Woah there! Why the hate for Lageman? He was a great pro and doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as those others. Mel Kiper may have gone off over the pick, but he was a really good player.
I have seen the 80's logo a lot lately on hats and shirts. I bet they are doing an alternate jersey with that logo this year and then probably updating that logo to be the team's new logo and jersey next year. Makes sense, at least.
I'd bet the same way. It really is the way to go, the two uniforms fans rememberand as much as I love the new/old uniforms we currently wear, I do like the original middle uniform. As long as it's the first one with the white facemask and without the black trim around the numbers.
I know, but thought wherever those were posted that perhaps the designer had stated why he didn't show the side of the helmets.
Was thinking the same thing. Same with the angled numbers. He jerseys fine, of it had normal block numbers and can the socks. The numbers and socks are trying too hard to be cutting edge and in a few seasons will look dated IMO.