who the fuck said Sacks??? I know those stats already, blow me. You seem frustrated, go jerk off to McFadden's weigh in pictures from the combine, and then come back and chat with us.
oh man.....did you just invite him to come back and chat with us? It's like "demonic possession" with this turd....once you invite the demon in, he never leaves.
he'll be back until week 7, then he'll disappear. I'll never think that the poster on this board is the same way in person... its impossible.
I've been wondering that as well, so I went to my good friend, Google, and typed in "Brunette big tits driving" and found this: NSFW Really http://www.hottestonly.com/hottest_...29841/Sexy_girl_with_big_boobs_driving_video/ Still have no idea who she is, but the chick in the video appears to be the same as the avatar from what I can tell.
This is significantly more important than giving Raider Joe the attention he is clearly lacking at home!
Wow..what is it going to cost to cut a #7 pick in the third year of their rookie contract? A bundle I would guess. Oh, I guess it's the fourth so it won't be as bad.
Again I would make that trade anytime a 2 and sixth for a 24 year old two time probowl CB 9any player), even though it didn't work out in this case(Deangelo Hall) Heck if i could get A boldin for the same price, i would do that in a heart beat. The trade was a no brainer . Deangelo Hall has the athethism to play in Raiders system, he not a Dwight Lowery type( probably not even on Raiders draft board) . Deangelo Hall was never comfortable playing up on the reciever( something Raiders do about 98 % of the time) , as he rather play a couple yards off the reciever(look at the QB) The system calls for the CBs to be man to man coverage and if one guys doing his own thing bad things happen. See Eddie Royal basically playing pitch and catch with Cutler all night long. Raiders could see after 8 weeks that Hall wasn't going to fit in their system. (just wasn't comfortable) Also No one could have for seen Raiders having their answer at CB, on their roster already- chris Johnson (might not have made the Deangelo hall trade) which lessen the sting somewhat of that trade. ITs my contention that Trading for Deangelo Hall had more to do with getting insurance for N Asomugha. Raiders system calls for having two CBs that excel in man to man coverage- your going to be left on an island 98% of time) IF hall would have worked out Raiders possible would have moved Asomugha (in a trade) and would have had two young CBs (S routt and D Hall to build their secondary around) Hall just wasn't the bump and run CB thought they were getting. (projection because he does have the athethi9sm to play in that type of system) It happens you move on. I can harp on the fact you drafted a Pass rusher at number six ,and you didn't get squat Production. Unlike the Raiders you didn't have anyone to pick up the slack in that deapartment. Chris Johnson was everything Deangelo hall was suppose to be. So beside the hugh Cap hit , everything still worked out for the Raiders. 6th rounder Trevor Scott>>>>>>>>> Vernon gholston Greyson Gunheim(undrafted FA) >>>>>>>>>Vernon Gholston.
lol @ that trade being a no-brainer... must be why anyone with a brain ripped Oakland for making that move.
Giants were willing to trade for Deangelo Hall and media was calling it tremendous move.(looked like they were going to get him) The fact is Falcons didn't want to send him to NFC and sent him to the Raiders instead. So its all perception over reality . Wow Giants coming off superbowl have the forsight to get A Cb like Hall, while Raiders( team struggling last five years) eventually get him(its suddendly a terrible deal) LMao Wakeup and smell the coffee. Again anyone with half a brain would always trade a 2 and 6 rounder for a 24 year old two time probowl CB/another position.
no-brainers are highly successful if you....... ohhhhhh NO_BRAINER, I get it.... as in no one has a brain in Oakland.
I like how Jeaux always says 98% man to man coverage corner as if he knows the actual percentage rate.
