Exactly. http://sports.espn.go.com/espnmag/story?id=3827402 Marvin has character issues that no one seems to talk about.
yes, we have brought in vet WR's before (mccareins, hatchette) but the big difference this time is we are NOT hanging the entire season on one vet signing. we already have a good D with a good D-minded head coach, a good O-line, a good TE, a good running game, good special teams, a good shot at being 'good'. bringing in a vet or two now should be seen more as 'tweeking' than franchise building. you really cant compare desperation moves (O'Donnell, Favre) with 'vet tweeking'.
wr is a very important part of a good offense. bringing in an old slug wont do a dam bit of good to anyone including the other wrs and the qb. sorry but marvin isnt the answer. burress or boldin would be.
I think Clowney and Stuckey should be ok for the type of offense we are going to run. Clowney can stretch the field while Stuckey catches most everything thrown his way.
