Help me settle an argument with my son. Who do you think has better offensive weapons, KC or TB? Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
He says it's close with the slight edge to TB. And I should have made it clear that we are excluding the QB position. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
The Chiefs have the edge because Kelce is probably the single biggest nightmare for defenses in the NFL. And that offense has been together for three years running. The Buccaneers probably have a more diverse group of weapons. AB and Godwin double as good underneath weapons and deep threats. Evans is an elite one on one catcher. The runningback situation is probably a negligible difference. Each side has had dominant running performances and non-existent running games at times. Buccaneers are a bit deeper, Chiefs are better.
