Well, we all blamed Schottenheimer so much and now we'll see if he is the real problem or not. If Sanchez doesnt improve any and Schottenheimers offense for the Rams becomes top 15 (which it could if they draft Blackmon), we all will then know he wasnt the "main" problem here.
good point. Lets keep deciding if Sanchez is our man or not as he did win 4 playoff games on the ROAD! Let Miami have Peyton. Mark is better.
and his #s were very similar to sacnhez's and he led his team to 8-8, what is the point? Also, Eli had Tiki Barber rushing for 1600 yds averaging over 5 YPC(as well as Jacobs chipping in another 400 plus on 4.4 YPC)- that is something Mark did not have this year.
Nah, just count the days until we take a shot at bringing in another QB. Unless he gets his head out of his ass and becomes just at least an average QB, he will be gone after next year. Are you going to follow your savior to his next team if Peyton does come here? Judging by a lot of his defenders on here, im sure a ton will.
Ooh, username smack. That's like 50 rungs down the ladder from Yo Mama jokes. Do you ever actually plan on adding something useful or interesting to the forum?
We certainly will. Sanchez is good enough to win with. Especially on a team built around great defense and special teams. Let's face it this team does not have a great amount of talent on both sides of the ball even if Tanny think's he has Victor Cruz's just sitting on the bench. I just hope Tannenbaum can start building this team the right way through the draft instead of being so impulsive in free agency.
Sanchez will win a Super Bowl this year. As long as all the calls do not go against the Jets Sanchez will win in year 4 because as you said hi #'s are similiar to Eli's.
True If Dilfer won Sanchez can. And our defense is great. Our run defense against Oakland was really elite and if we had Leonard we beat the Giants. And our kicker and punter and return game are all pros.
Peyton is going to milk the Jets for the best possible offer and then sign for about 90% of that in Arizona.
Nah, Eli is now a HOF QB- didn't you hear? he willed the Giants to victory w/ his superb play on Sunday. Did you see the way he made those defneders collide? the way he had the refs blow the whistle on the Bradshaw fumble? all those long scoring drives that started deep in SF territory were all Eli too. No onew can win unless you have Eli!
I think any team can win with any QB as long as they are built properly in all areas. Tannanbaum is a fool anyways for even thinking we have someone like Cruz on our roster. Cruz is faster than any player on this offense and is a great router runner with superb hands. The plays he is making this year after the catch, i havent seen anything like that here since we had Santana Moss. Holmes, Burress, and Curley are nowhere near as skilled as Cruz. I get that Mike T wants to talk his team up but he should be a little realistic..
You need to stop trolling this thread. You're off-topic at this point given that the topic is Mark Sanchez.
Actually Keller was Sanchez's leading receiver in 10. And Holmes and LT were only one catch behind Edwards's number. And for a right handed Qb, if you think having a different RT is the same as a different LT, I think you might consider refraining from posting for a reasonable period of time and instead reading more about football. And you are another Schotty Hater. meh. There's no evidence Eli's coaching situation in 07 was any better. Plus the Sanchez Fans leave out the league has become more Qb friendly stat wise. But compared to his peers, Eli had already attained the 18th overall ranking in his second year, 2006. True, due to the changes I mentioned, Eli dropped to 25th in 2007, but by that point he'd already shown he was better than that the year before. And whadya know, in 2008 Eli bounced back up to 14th. Meanwhile Sanchez was 28th his first year, and his second year, the year Eli had improved to 18th, Mark moved up a whopping single position to 27th. In his third year, the year the Sanchez Fans Selective Stat Club loves to focus on compared to Eli, Mark was still only 23rd, while Eli had an OFF YEAR. This will not stop Sanchez Fans from making ridiculous comparisons to Eli, though. It's all they have.
He'll come to us unless the offers are high to start with. Any free agent worth his salt knew that you always talked to Steinbrenner even if you had no intention of going to the Yankees. Same thing is true for the Jets right now. Tanny has spent Woody's money freely in the last 4 years and it would be irresponsible of Peyton's reps not to talk to the Jets to establish the market they will sell into elsewhere.
Rankings don't tell the full story. Sanchez was MUCH better in 2010 but the rankings don't tell us that, we should actually watch these guys play rather than just rely on rankings. Sanchez in 2010 was better than Eli in any year besides 2008 and 2011(possibly 2009).
lol lol Sanchez 77 qb rating was better than Eli's 93 rating. LEts not forget Sanchise's 4 playoff road wins. HE threw for a whopping 100 yards against the Chargers and he had a great 62.4 rating against the Colts when we beat them. (hush hush do not mention Caldwells misuse of timeouts.)
I never said that a different RT is comparable to a different LT with a right-handed quarterback. But continue to believe I don't know what I'm talking about and you're the be all end all of anything football related. If you think that hot garbage sitting at RT doesn't have an effect on a right handed quarterback continually having to shift and make that guy miss who routinely beats him, you're wrong. Or that coaching doesn't have any sort of effect whatsoever on play-calling or scheming then again, you're wrong. Again I don't think you fully appreciate what Edwards brought to this team in the vertical pass game that was virtually non-existent all year or in the run game. He was an extremely effective blocker. Not to mention the passion and desire the guy played with on the field. I'm sorry but that offense had more talent than the Jets plain and simple.
do you watch football or just look at ratings? and how come you don't note Mark's better postseason rating if you are so infatuated w/ ratings? did you watch the SD game? Please explain Caldwell's misuse of timeouts and how that affect the outcome of that game?
Yes I watched the SD kicker miss 2 easy kicks. Yes I recall Mark with a 62.4 rating against the great Colts defense. Your third question is a joke right. Any smart guy like you can figure it out. Or are you not as smart as your ego.:grin:
