Jets trading up to #1 Overall?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Jabba the Jet, Feb 27, 2006.

  1. legler82

    legler82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    13,337
    Likes Received:
    7,258
    True but the following is also true:

    Franchise. QBs are not always 1st Rounders.

    See Brett Farvre, Joe Montana & Tom Brady.
     
  2. Mexican Buc

    Mexican Buc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,471
    Likes Received:
    39
    If the Jets move up- its Bush. You will not draft a QB #1 overall- no way. You still have Chad and many QBs will be out this FA looking for jobs. Many RBs too, Jamal, Shaun, Edge- but all carry WAS to big a price tag. A managing QB doesn't. PLus Curtis is old- everyone knows he's on his last leg, RB is as much if not bigger youth-movement need than QB. And when you have the most explosive RB to ever touch the football on the board you damn well take him.
     
  3. Mexican Buc

    Mexican Buc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,471
    Likes Received:
    39
    :shit: :jets: :shit:
     
    #163 Mexican Buc, Feb 27, 2006
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2006
  4. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    Something I just thought of...maybe the compensation we receive from the Abe trade will be involved in a possible trade for the #1 pick?

    So for example...We get #29 or #22 from the Broncos...

    We would then package those two picks and a third rounder from this year and a 2007 second rounder to get #1...

    It would prevent us from having to trade our first rounder for 2001 which will more than likely be a high pick...
     
  5. AnyGivenSunday

    AnyGivenSunday Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    The problem with that thinking is that if Houston is going to trade out of #1, chances are they are still going to be targeting Ferguson. So in any trade up, the Jets would most likely have to trade #4 to move up to #1
     
  6. AMJets

    AMJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    22,507
    Likes Received:
    77
    Oh give me a break. This love for Reggie Bush really needs to be toned down. It is getting out of control.
     
  7. Green Hurricane

    Green Hurricane Footsteps Falco

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Messages:
    7,728
    Likes Received:
    0
    Now that would be a terrible trade. Actually, if it's anything more than JA and #4, I'd be solidly against it.
     
  8. edal

    edal New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is EXACTLY correct!
     
  9. edal

    edal New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think if it cost us our #4 and John Abraham to choose #1, we would take it to get Leinart. However, I think Houston would want our #1 from 2007 too.
     
    #169 edal, Feb 28, 2006
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2006
  10. edal

    edal New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    You never know. Houston does'nt need a QB or a running back. Take out the public pressure, I'm sure the coaching staff "knows" the Brick is the right choice for them if they want to rebuild their team. That's where the Jets have the upper hand as far as choosing who they would consider trading their #1 pick with.
     
    #170 edal, Feb 28, 2006
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2006
  11. winstonbiggs

    winstonbiggs 2008/2009 TGG Bill Parcells "Most Respected" Award

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    He was the third best running back on the field in his last college football game. All time sounds like a bit of a stretch.
     

Share This Page