Jets trade up for Stephen Hill

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by boozer32, Apr 27, 2012.

  1. ILL-AL

    ILL-AL Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Messages:
    667
    Likes Received:
    29
    Great pick! Coples and Hill? So far, so good!
     
  2. boozer32

    boozer32 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    5,726
    Likes Received:
    3,887
    Another plus for Hill with the Jets deploying two inaccurate QB. It looks like he is good at making adjustments on poorly throw passes. This year not looking for much production but give the coaches another year to coach him up.
     
  3. njjet

    njjet Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    364
    Likes Received:
    12
    Don't like giving up picks...we need players...do like Hill
     
  4. TNJet

    TNJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    6,312
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    Great pick, takes the sting out of the Coples pick.
     
  5. Wahoo

    Wahoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Messages:
    4,846
    Likes Received:
    2,882
    Offensive line? Anyone? Anyone?
     
  6. The 1985er

    The 1985er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    So we waste a pick on a position that wasn't a big need. Is he without a doubt better than Patrick Turner? If we would have traded up it should have been for Upshaw.
     
  7. Brunell's Debt

    Brunell's Debt New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,677
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know how anyone who watched the games last year could say that a WR who can stretch the field isn't a big need.

    I like the Hill pick. He's a project to be sure, but we know that he can go deep which is enough for his rookie year.
     
  8. The 1985er

    The 1985er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    I'm not saying we don't need a number 2 receiver. I'm saying that we should have picked up a young veteran ala Braylon Edwards. Someone who is proven in this league opposite Holmes. We have 3 young receivers with potential already, we don't need a 4th.

    This draft should have been about loading up on pass rushers, safetys and o linemen.
     
  9. Brunell's Debt

    Brunell's Debt New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,677
    Likes Received:
    0
    I still just don't understand the Braylon hard-on. He had a useless, miserable year last season and not a single team is convinced that he's recovered enough to sign him this offseason.

    I like Edwards and I hope he comes back at full strength, but there's absolutely zero indication that he will.
     
  10. Going4TheGreen

    Going4TheGreen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,926
    Likes Received:
    26
    Also, Braylon is 29 and coming off a season mired in injuries. That wouldn't have been the worst route to go, but now we have our franchise guy for Sanchez to work with. He will finally have consistency and Hill has 1st round, star potential.
     
  11. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,577
    This pick is better then our 1st round pick, Hill was a guy I had going in round 1 and as the 3rd best WR in the draft. He is a bit of a project but you can't coach up size and speed. Basically we got an Edwards clone but quite a few years younger. I think the best pick we've made under Rex Ryan after Sanchez.
     
  12. #28Martin

    #28Martin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,524
    Likes Received:
    451
    He played for a school that doesn't throw.
     
  13. #28Martin

    #28Martin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,524
    Likes Received:
    451
    Wasn't a need? It was a major need. Kiper still has it as a need AFTER the pick.. En how it's a need.
     
  14. The 1985er

    The 1985er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    I used Braylon as an example. I hope Hill steps up as that deep threat.
     
  15. Brunell's Debt

    Brunell's Debt New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Edwards would've been an alright stopgap option, but he's no longer the kind of player that you can plan your future around.

    I had Hill as the 3rd best receiver on the board after Blackmon and Floyd. Getting him with the 43rd pick is great value.

    Coples I can understand, but I just don't get the complaining about Hill.
     
  16. GreenMachine

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    12,528
    Likes Received:
    6
  17. The 1985er

    The 1985er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    I already explained my reason why I thought it wasn't a need. We have a good number 1 guy in Holmes and a slot guy in Kerley. We have 3 young receivers with potential in Turner, Payne, and Chaz. All we needed was a deep threat and I felt we should have went the free agent route to fill that need.
     
  18. GreenMachine

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    12,528
    Likes Received:
    6
    Umm Hill is a deep threat....

    He had the 2nd fastest 40 time off any WR this year.
     
  19. Brunell's Debt

    Brunell's Debt New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,677
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think that Turner, Payne and Chaz are anywhere near good enough to justify passing on a guy with Hill's talent at the 43rd pick. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
     
  20. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,599
    Likes Received:
    24,548
    What about 'a rookie right tackle will suck as badly as Hunter' don't you understand? If the Jets are going to improve at RT for this season, it's either the best that the first round has to offer at the position, which they weren't in position to capitalize on, or a free agent vet. Now they're going to have to wait until cuts happen after the draft. Get over it.
     

Share This Page