well, they've finally tabulated the results for "Predict the score, week 9 Giants-Pats" Apparently picking the correct winner or picking the correct margin is not as important as picking the correct point total... Thus picking the Giants to win 17-14 -- correct winner and a three point win when the actual was a 4 point win only gets you into 82nd place using Kool-aid Drinking Pat fan logic Scores of genius predicting their cheating douchebags to win by huge margins with a closer total point total ended up in a better position So it makes no difference in the wonderful world of Patriot Alice in Wonderland if your team wins or loses, only how many points are scored
I can name seven wide receivers I'd rather have than Welker. Andre Johnson Calvin Johnson Roddy White Larry Fitzgerald Greg Jennings Hakeem Nicks Vincent Jackson
Also, I like how the the thread was titled anyone *still* think he is the best. Like it's been such a forgone conclusion that he's the best wide out in the game and he might be on the decline now. Stupid fucking retards.
Is the 'Tailgate Meetups' section turning into a dating service? http://www.patsfans.com/new-england...-anybody-want-hang-out-pats-fan-sometime.html
This, I don't think he's the best, but no team in the NFL would be worse off having an incredibly reliable receiver like Welker working underneath, that's for sure.
ROFL @ "I have a dell computer" Damn... I ALSO have a dell computer and I have never used it as a tool for marketing myself when meeting new people. Clearly I have a thing or 2 to learn about life.
saying a guy is the best reciever because he led the league in receptions is so stupid. if that was the case i guess mike furrey was the second best wr in the league in 2006?