Jets looking for WR/Marshall or Bowe on radar? - NY Daily News

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Pavlus53, Aug 19, 2009.

  1. nyjcanada

    nyjcanada Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Messages:
    6,846
    Likes Received:
    16
    i really don't think marshall is that available. Unless the Jets are going to bowl them over with a 1st rounder, he's got great talent and has no leverage to continue his holdout, so it should be quick and over soon.
     
  2. bajakian

    bajakian New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2009
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Marshalls situation is alot like Leons - the both are under contract and dont have much leverage unless they want to shoot their way out of town. the difference is that Leon is less likely to be a divisive player-He enjoys the game too much to sit out.
     
  3. Oasis

    Oasis Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    1
    I've NEVER understood NFL teams' reluctance to trade draft picks for players! Considering how many 1st and 2nd round picks end up as busts/ average players, why not trade and get someone who is PROVEN to be a game changer(in this case Marshall). The way i see it, the Jets will keep this 1st rounder and struggle at WR all year..they'll have to try to fix that hole in the offseason, whether it is through the draft or through free agency. Right now the top possible free agents in 2010 are Braylon, TO, and Lee Evans...these are only if they don't resign with their teams. None of those options, IMO, are as good as Brandon Marshall. And if the Jets do look to the draft for a WR, i guarantee they won't find someone that can make an impact like Marshall within the next 5 years at least.... I'm just frustrated that this team could improve immediately and become a super bowl contender this year and for years to come, yet they'd rather sit back and hope all turns out well with their future drafts.
     
  4. bojanglesman

    bojanglesman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    The problem is that you are screwed as an owner either way. You overpay for an unproven rookie or you really overpay for a proven veteran. Sure, you know what you get with the veteran in most cases, but there is always the chance you can get a rookie at a decent price and when he develops, you still get to pay him less than he should make for a few years on that rookie contract (until he bitches and holds out for a re-worked contract). Of course, you are also quite likely to have a rookie who sucks balls like Ryan Leaf.

    As much as it pains me to say it, the smart move is what Belichick does, get 2nd-4th Rd draft picks, pay less for them and mold them into your system. One of his best talents is getting great talent at reasonable prices. The teams that go out and spend big bucks on the latest big-time talent (Cowboys, Redskins, etc) seem to always flop even with the big names.
     
  5. The Lord

    The Lord Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,572
    Likes Received:
    0
    What's a fair offer here? A 2nd and a 5th? TJ and a 3rd?
     
  6. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    I'd give Denver a 2nd and TJ for Marshall. If they don't take that I'd look into Bowe.
     
  7. Oasis

    Oasis Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    1
    i don't think we're giving up TJ
     
  8. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Nobody knows what the front office is thinking. It'd be understandible to take from a position of depth to address a position of need.
     
  9. EAF29

    EAF29 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    5
    Why would Denver want TJ, they drafted Moreno in the 1st, and also have Correll Buchhalter, Lamont Jordan and Peyton Hillis. I don't see how Denver would be willing to do this without a 1st round pick and possibly more. With all of Marshall's baggage, losing a 1st rounder, and the high money contract that we would be required, it just doesn't seem like the ideal fit.
     
  10. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ditto for this. I'm not sure what Denver would be looking for other than picks. Orton's struggles make me think they might be interested in a QB, but I'm sure at the same time that they're willing to go this season with their current options regardless and take one to develop in the 2010 draft.
     
  11. lobacz87

    lobacz87 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2004
    Messages:
    408
    Likes Received:
    0
    you can bet that one of the recievers would be thrown in the deal...Brad Smith or Stuckey probably
     
  12. NYJetsMan7

    NYJetsMan7 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    10
    Clemens anyone?? haha :wink:
     
  13. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    Maybe the plot is thickening.

    "SEATTLE — There is something amiss between the Broncos and Brandon Marshall.

    The Broncos made a curious decision Friday when they decided not to take their top receiver with them for their preseason game here tonight against the Seattle Seahawks.

    Three other Broncos players — Brian Dawkins, Knowshon Moreno and Brandon Lloyd — also didn't make the trip. However, they were all held back because of injuries.

    Marshall is healthy. His status with the team seemed to change Tuesday afternoon when his agent, Kennard McGuire, met with Broncos management to reiterate a trade request Marshall said he first delivered to owner Pat Bowlen during a face-to-face meeting in June."

    "Should the Broncos reach the point of placing Marshall on the trading block, they likely would expect first- and fourth-round draft picks in return. The first-rounder would be based on Marshall's first-round production in the past two seasons, when he recorded a combined 206 catches. The fourth-rounder represents the round Marshall was drafted in 2006."

    Not too high a price to pay.

    http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_13182800
     
  14. Green Hurricane

    Green Hurricane Footsteps Falco

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Messages:
    7,728
    Likes Received:
    0
    Honestly, I wouldn't mind sending a 1st and 4th rounder for Marshall. I mean, I know its a high price to pay for someone with the off the field issues he's had, but it's still a 25 year old WR that's already in his prime. If the Jets keep that pick it's going to be a WR in the next draft anyway, might as well just get things going a bit early.
     
  15. jilozzo

    jilozzo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    8,264
    Likes Received:
    2,668
    tough spot cause IMO the jets are destined for 6-10 which would be a decent # in the first round next year.....we are not talking a low 1st rounder unless we all get surprised.

    if i am the GM i go no higher than a 2. we have to keep that 1st rounder next year. it will give us leverage to move down next year.

    TJ cannot get traded. we have a rookie QB. nuff said. we need all the capable backs we can get.

    see if they bite for a 2nd and 4th - wonder if they could make that 2nd become a 1 in the unlikely scenario of the jets making the playoffs. which would be a lower pick in R1 obviously.

    tough cause we need to break the pattern of diminishing picks. gotta starting accumulating at some point.

    jil
     
  16. scoochydawg

    scoochydawg Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2002
    Messages:
    3,434
    Likes Received:
    10
    I want this:
    [YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16qhwX26vOA[/YOUTUBE]
     
  17. rhodesfan16

    rhodesfan16 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,119
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would have to go with Bowe, he is an underrated receiver to begin with but he has been reliable even with his crappy qb play the last couple of years, I'm surprised the chiefs want to give up on Bowe after two seasons. Even though Marshall is more skilled, I think Bowe would be cheaper and still be quite productive
     
  18. JohnnyJohnson

    JohnnyJohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    6,084
    Likes Received:
    0
    BM's nickname should be "Make you miss"
     
  19. greenbeanz

    greenbeanz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,815
    Likes Received:
    121
    1st and a 4th for this might actually be a steal. hes an absolute animal. there are not too many recievers that physical in the nfl. the guy runs through people as well as around them. i dont see why we shouldnt make this move.
     
  20. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    His yards after catch in those highlights were phenomenal.
     

Share This Page