Isn't picking a receiver in round 1 a virtual certainty?

vilmatic · Mar 4, 2009

CKNY6 said: ↑

Either we take a WR or we wait for one to drop and then trade down. While they aren't positions of need, Faneca is 32, Woody is 31, Ellis is 31, Coleman is 30, and Sheppard could be one and done with is contract so CB, DE, or OL could wind up being our first round picks. Once you hit the bottom of the draft there are at least 5 teams (Chicago, Philadelphia, Minnesota, The Giants, and Tennessee) that could use a #1 WR and depending on who falls could garner us another 3rd or possibly 2nd round pick.

Factor in the fact that we want to run the ball a lot more, Jones is 30, and Leon is the only other viable option at HB and we could conceivably look at HB as well in the first round if not the second.
Click to expand...

I'm not so sure I agree about what we could gain in trading out of our spot, but I think the general mindset here pretty much mirrors my own. Big uglies for either line, possibly a bruising back, but if Sanchez, for some reason, falls to us, you HAVE TO consider it. All the pluses and minuses about him aside, I think Sanchez and Ryan could mesh quite well together.

EdBell · Mar 4, 2009

It's simple: BPA = Best player available.

One word of advice Tanny: no hats ("Beanie"), illnesses ("Stafford", Lauranitis") or hyphens

Zcore · Mar 4, 2009

DHarris52 said: ↑

God I hope not. A WR is useless without a QB that can throw the ball to him.

QB is the first and foremost need for this team. Period.
Click to expand...

I couldn't agree more. Although I do like Ratliff's potential

Isn't picking a receiver in round 1 a virtual certainty?

vilmatic Active Member

EdBell New Member

Zcore New Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches

Isn't picking a receiver in round 1 a virtual certainty?

vilmatic Active Member

EdBell New Member

Zcore New Member

Share This Page