If T. Rich drops to around #10

Discussion in 'Draft' started by gsulli5861, Feb 11, 2012.

  1. FJF

    FJF 2018 MVP Joe Namath Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    27,721
    Likes Received:
    31,387
    personally i would rather get one game changer and 3-4 depth guys.
    this team right now has too few above average players and too many guys that should be depth.
     
  2. Endlessly Counting

    Endlessly Counting Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    4,651
    Likes Received:
    1,345
    No trade ups in the first round this year
    Our track historical record when picking around 15 is good
     
  3. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    This team has too many heaping sacks of shit as starters.

    Hunter, Smith, Poole, Pace (ok hes not THAT bad), whoever starts opposite Pace that week, our DL is meh, Plax (or his replacement), Mulligan.

    Id take 5-6 guys who are 7/10s @ their position instead of getting one guy who is a 9/10 + some trash depth

    Thats just me tho
     
  4. joeklecko

    joeklecko New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,465
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's been Tanny's approach up til now, and it's why the Jets have no depth and so many holes.
     
  5. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    worth watching
     
  6. jilozzo

    jilozzo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    8,264
    Likes Received:
    2,668
    strictly off the top of the head.......

    aaron glenn
    hugh douglas
    j. mitchell
    revis
    vilma
    moss

    sure there are more but not too bad.
     
  7. xxedge72x

    xxedge72x 2018 Gang Green QB Guru Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    12,286
    Likes Received:
    3,954
    In a vacuum I believe you are correct. Having a home run hitting running back would certainly make a huge impact on the offense.

    However - the question is who to take at 16. If Richardson falls to the Jets at 16, and talentwise there is an equally talented receiver and/or safety and/or outside linebacker on the board, then I'd take any of those three over the playmaking running back because I believe they would make a bigger impact.

    If Richardson is BPA then I'm all for him - however when you weight position based on need I believe Richardson would be a luxury pick.
     
  8. Attackett

    Attackett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    5,512
    If Richardson is still available at 16 there is no debate he is the BPA and I don't care who is still on the board. I find it extremely unlikely at this early stage that he makes it out of top 10.

    I don't really want to trade up for anyone but if he does make it past 10 we should be calling around to see what it will take.
     
  9. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think its completely worthless for us to call around to look into the trade up option.

    Because any team willing to shop their pick is ABSOLUTELY going to call up Cinci and have them match or beat any offer we make.

    And I absofrickenlutely guarentee they will match or exceed any offer we put out there.

    The only, and I mean ONLY way possible that TRich is a jet is if we select him @ 16 overall.

    Nothing else will happen, period.
     
  10. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    I think if Richardson falls out of the top 10, Cincy swoops in by trading up. I do not see him falling to us. I'm not a draft expert, but if he is as good as every thinks, I don't think half the league passes on him.
     
  11. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont think it happens either.

    But simply put the running back isnt very important in Rodger Goodells nfl
     
  12. Phear

    Phear New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    This would be true if we had a good scouting department. If we keep all of our picks I would be surprised if we got more than 3 good to decent players.
     
  13. FJF

    FJF 2018 MVP Joe Namath Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    27,721
    Likes Received:
    31,387

    there is not 1 team that pulls 5-6 contributors in one draft

    and like i said,if there is a chance to get a real game changer(not necessarily t-rich) on either side of the ball i would give up some picks to get him
     
  14. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Jets 2006: Ferguson, Mangold, E. Smith, B. Smith, L. Washington, D. Coleman ...
     
  15. joeklecko

    joeklecko New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,465
    Likes Received:
    0
    If that's the case, then that should be all the evidence that Woody would ever need to fire Tanny and the whole scouting dept. Sooner or later, Woody needs to wake the eff up, hire a team president that is a football man and has a solid career working in the NFL, and let him hire the new GM and over see the whole football operation. Neither Tanny nor Woody is the guy to be running things and making football decisions.
     
  16. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have to admit after reading Cimini's newest Q&A and us legitimately having a chance @ Mario Williams (if the front office wants him)

    If we could get Williams then id be a huge fan of us trading up for Trich.

    Id be even happier if we did that then maybe traded Greene for a 3rd or even 4th
     
  17. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    What the madden offseason is this?

    Do you have a link to that cimini q&a?
     
  18. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    our main jets forums in there.

    by no means does it suggest they will happen, but he suggests all 3 are in the realm of possability
     
  19. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,841
    Likes Received:
    24,871
    What makes you think Woody has the foggiest clue about what he is doing as an NFL owner? Look at his tenure of ownership. It's like Pin The Tail On The Donkey. Football style. He really is the Charlie Brown of franchise owners.
     
  20. joeklecko

    joeklecko New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,465
    Likes Received:
    0
    You get no argument from me on that. In fact, I'm in total agreement and have said as much here and on other sites. One would think that he'd look at some of the other, more successful teams and see how they are run, and then take a look at Jets' history and see what has been missing. That missing piece is a football man to serve as President of the team and to make all the decisions regarding football. If Woody had half a brain, he'd have done that already by looking at Leon Hess' lousy example of how NOT to own/run a team.
     

Share This Page