In Basketball, its generally the last 4 minutes. But my point, more or less, was Eric Smith whiffing, on Teblow.
I think it's part of a cycle. Rex's first draft they went Sanchez, Greene, Slauson. Then they traded for Braylon, traded for Holmes, signed LT as the big moves. They went in for the offense, it just didn't last as long as they wanted or expected. So when they started to work on making the defense solid inside out, the offense didn't sustain as long as they wanted. I'm sure offense is addressed heavily next offseason/draft.
This would almost be believable if it wasn't coming from the mouth of someone who claims Sanchez is a top 10 QB. Sorry, your argument on both counts, fail!.
I don't mean to belabor this point, but if we're calling out folks for incorrectly claiming top-10 anything--has anyone figured out how may top-10 offenses Schotty had without Favre? Seriously--just wondering. _
Hey that reminds me, I already admitted I used a faulty source of information and it was my fault for not having double checked it before posting. As I said then, and repeat now, it's a mistake I won't make a second time. But hey, if one mistake is all you can defend yourself with to try to discredit me then I'm golden
Not to belabor the point, ahem, but I admit when I'm mistaken on facts, and in that case I was and I did admit to the error of not verifying the statistics. But, hey if the best argument against my overall argument is that I made one statistical mistake and that's the point you have to hang your hat on, I'm golden in the overall picture as it means I'm only batter .999 instead of 1.000
Totally sorry--I saw the top 10 dig and I wasn't sure you had recanted. I thought you had continued to trot that out even after someone put up the "stats". I won't mention it again. As long as you don't. :smile: _
Hey you were the one who posted the "point" back to back saying "not to belabor the point". I was just mocking your second "Not to belabor the point".
But to be fair, Until I had verified that the stats posted to debunk what I had posted about Schotty I did, foolishly, stick to the point. I got sloppy and didn't double check my source information and of course got burnt by it. It's why generally I rely on gathering information myself, but nobody's perfect
Once again deflecting. It must really suck to have no clue what you are talking about that you always have to deflect.
This coming from the king of deflections and moving the goal posts. Both of your points have been completely debunked, and not just by myself. You self declaration of yourself as (S)anchez fan, opps I mean "Super fan" only further demonstrates your narcissistic tendencies.
A) I didn't declare myself a superfan, my fans declared me that. B) the next point of mine that you debunk will be the first. it's clear to anyone reading these arguments that you don't have a clue about this game.
Signs of a narcissistic personality. Refers to self as superfan. claims to have "Fans" who have declared him as such. Claims to have won arguments that they've clearly lost (I'd list them all but frankly I don't think the Database could handle a list that long). In short, the only argument you've won is inside your head.
Laugh, sign #4 of a narcissist. believes all others are the "little people". Signature of a Junc "win". Junc: Blah blah blah, erroneous stat, blah blah blah, out of context example, blah blah blah. other poster: Fact 1 fact 2 fact 3 fact 4 all disproving Junc's statement. Junc: restate previous false statements, deflect to unrelated example, say watch more football.... Junc, you use circular logic that if applied in an academic, or even most real world, scenarios would get you laughed out of existence. But it's okay Junc, keep telling yourself that the Sun orbits the Earth.....I'm sure that will make it eventually tru.:breakdance:
erroneous stat? like your SOS #s? all you can do is post made up stuff to deflect but again THANK YOU for being a fan!
