Gronks TD

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by cval, Oct 21, 2012.

  1. cval

    cval Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    3,519
    Likes Received:
    3,237
    I think he bobbled the ball and then the ball hit the ground no overturn. Few other big calls that went the other way. How about phantom hold on Sanchez's 15 yard scramble. The PI is already being talked about.
     
  2. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    It looked like a TD to me. He had full control. Rule is the ball can touch the ground in full control but the ball has to remain possessed through the touching of the ground.
     
  3. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Señor Ding Dong of Mods
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,642
    Likes Received:
    1,400
    We are talking about the 1st one, I thought the ball scraped the ground. Big difference between the ball touching the ground and teh ball scraping the ground. CBS only showed one replay once in which it showed the ball on the ground and they never showed it again.
     
  4. Tamba_Trio

    Tamba_Trio Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2006
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    46
    It's not the no overturn that annoyed me it's the fact that it wasn't reviewed.
     
  5. CowboysFan

    CowboysFan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    All scores are automatically reviewed upstairs.
     
  6. FriendlyDolphin

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    4
    Gronk raped you guys all over especially on the final drive of the 4th and how could he be left so open on the 2nd TD ....
     
  7. b.reyes16

    b.reyes16 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Messages:
    2,297
    Likes Received:
    691
    At least I will win my fantasy matchup barring the Bears D/ST pulling off about 20 points.
     
  8. Royal Tee

    Royal Tee Girls juss wanna have fun
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    21,323
    Likes Received:
    3,799
    I was telling the wifey this...
    The refs were almost dead on today but the TD was comfirmed upstairs so quickly that you have to question just wtf they are looking @.

    He bobbled the ball, then it hit the floor...now 2 things you look @ that are relevant to what changes the call.
    - Was he already OOB by the time he gained possession
    - Did he already have possession before the ball touching the ground.

    Now remember, they changed the rule allowing the ball to touch if the receiver has clear possession...

    IMO, This could have easily been called no TD but may not have had enough to overturn.


     
  9. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    That was a TD. The only gripe we have is that PI call on Wilson in OT. Fucking horseshit.
     
  10. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,428
    Likes Received:
    152
    I agree. This should have been looked at. Was it a catch? Probably. But the ball moved a little bit, and he wasn't in-bounds for long. Was at least worth a look.
     
  11. cval

    cval Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    3,519
    Likes Received:
    3,237
    What about then phantom holding call?
     
  12. sanchise

    sanchise Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2012
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    1
    The pass interference in OT was a bad call. but no major refereeing controversies
     
  13. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Mack they review every TD.
     
  14. CJLang

    CJLang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    5,490
    Likes Received:
    541
    While I think the TD call probably would have stood, I was very surprised the ref didn't have to go under the hood on that one. I've seen much more obvious stuff reviewed.

    Red Zone channel showed it 3 or 4 times
     
  15. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Ya I guess that too. Fuck, tough to lose like that.
     
  16. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Señor Ding Dong of Mods
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,642
    Likes Received:
    1,400
    They did review it but it was confirmed so quickly. CBS only showed one really good replay once and the ball looks as if it scraped the ground.
     
  17. rjmkrm

    rjmkrm Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    1
    sucks big time
     
  18. wildaces

    wildaces Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was surprised we really didn't see any replays of the catch or the PI call. You typically see slow mo's on catches, and PI calls usually get shown a couple times.

    However, the catch was reviewed, and confirmed. The PI call is what it is.
     
  19. BJXX

    BJXX New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2012
    Messages:
    312
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good question.......hope we beat you next week.
     
  20. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    The announcers/camera crew were late on a lot of things. They didn't show the holding call on NE, instead showing a catch that didn;t count. They missed that Hill was hurt for two plays. Missed Cumberland was hurt until he was in the tunnel. Missed the PI call to show it. Barely broke down plays and design of them.
     

Share This Page