Consistently fail at a job,not only is it a job but it is ESPN the sports network known across America and they still have jobs even though u say fail at everything, please think before u post.
I'm a little tired of people who apparently are uncomfortable stringing coherent sentences together attempting to insult my intelligence. It just doesn't jibe.
Sorry i dont understand, i'll guess i'll just have to type in a way u understand, because u get uncomfortable when people dont type correctly.:up:
Or maybe just type your posts backwards so I don't even bother reading them! :up: Edit: You're halfway there already.
Emotionally based drivel? Did you even read your own post? I didn't even call you a troll. I was refuting your posts logically and did not ONCE insult, namecall, or ridicule. Yet I am the one basing his posts on emotion. I could care less what the draft guides say. No one knows what any of the teams draft boards looked like. And I could care less if they reached. The point of the draft is to get players to help you win on the field, period, end of story. The value of the draft comes in the W-L stats, not on the draft grades that Kiper or some idiot on the internet says. It does not mean just because they did not pick the players you thought they should have they were bad picks. No one wins or loses in the draft. Draft grades and values mean crap, nothing. What matters is the production on the fied. If you reach for a player in the 4th round that everyone says should go in the 7th, but he becomes the cornerstone of a defense that wins a SB, WHO GIVES A CRAP WHERE HE WAS DRAFTED!!!!!!!!!!! The purpose is to win games, not get perceived value from draftniks and fans. By the way there have been several reports that said if the Jets didn't draft Schegel when they did, the Pats were going to take him in the same round. Like I said no one knows what these teams draft boards look like. This has to be one of the most illogical and useless posts I have read on this board. You did not address ANY point I made. You accused me of being emotional when I presented my arguement in a logical fashion, and you went on to name call. If you do not want to be called a troll, stop acting like one. Oh, and by the way, if you notice I have not once said if I agreed with the picks or not. I am disputing your logic (which is severely lacking), and perception of Kiper as God.
Can u really not understand my sentences, if u have nothing to say dont say anything. Stop making up stuff cause u look dumb.
Completely illogical. Do you want to count how many players Kiper had going on the first day and fell to the second? You have NO IDEA what the teams boards look like, you are basing all of you arguments on Kiper's ratings. And how do you know where the other teams had Schegel and Smith ranked? Please let me know. Right now, please list where the other 31 teams had these players ranked on their boards and where you got your information. Until you do that, you are full of shit. If you knew anything about football you would know there is more to team needs then 40 times. How about leadership? How about being able to read offenses? How about tackling ability and angles? Give me a break. Also, no one knows what scheme Mangini is implementing, so how do you know what the team needs? No you are treating the draft like it is an NFL game where people win or lose. It is a way to get players to build the team the organization wants. What matters is wins and loses, not grading well in the draft. Draft value, draft grades, are all meaningless and crap. Last I heard there was no trophy for having the best draft and getting the best "value." Did I once use the ratings to defend the selection of any player? Draft ratings are crap. Be they from Kiper, or idiots on an internet message board. What matters are the teams boards and getting the players they target so they can win games. The rest is for the fans, fantasy football junkies, and draftniks working for ESPN. Draft ratings of players, positive or negative, are useless and meaningless. The only way to meaningfully judge a draft is the production of the players you drafted, and whether or not that production translates into wins. Winning is what matters, not the draft. Why don't you try addressing the points I have made. Stop putting words in my mouth.
Should I be answering your sage opinion above, how ESPN has guys like Kiper because they're successful? That's crap. ESPN has a stranglehond on a corner of the market. They could put a microphone on a dog turd an no one would notice. In fact, they have: And the more you refuse to spell out a 3-letter word, the more like a child you appear.
YOU are u happy now. Whether you like it or not ESPN is the most well-respected and well-known sports network in the U.S. so im sorry if i dont respect your opinion more than their's.
