ferguson is a huge mistake

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by MeanGreen80, Apr 21, 2006.

  1. Jetphan73

    Jetphan73 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    273
    Likes Received:
    42
    EXACTLY I TOTALLY AGREE!
     
  2. Jetphan73

    Jetphan73 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    273
    Likes Received:
    42
    jOLLEY CAN NOT PLAY-HE CAN'T BLOCK AT ALL B/C HE IS BASICALLY A BIG WR, NOT A TE. HE'S 240 LBS.MAX! I LIKE BAKER BUT DREESEN WILL BE A CHEAP MAN'S BECHT-SERVICABLE AT BEST. DAVIS IS THE NEXT GONZALEZ POTENTIALLY AND THE JET NEED AT LEAST 1 PLAYMAKER ON OFFENSE-NAME ONE WE HAVE?COLES MAYBE WITH A REAL QB UNLIKE LAST YEAR BUT NO ONE ELSE EVEN COMES CLOSE TO SCARING D COORDINATORS!
     
  3. PRPitbull

    PRPitbull Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    0
    CAPS lock key broken?
     
  4. ViLmAfAn5128

    ViLmAfAn5128 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,284
    Likes Received:
    0
    lolololololol
     
  5. dabrowsk1

    dabrowsk1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,519
    Likes Received:
    7
    Talk about a biased opinion. How can you make that judgement about Dreesen? He hardly played, so what exactly are you basing this opinion on? He is big, showed good hands, and already a good blocker. And the more he played the better he got. There is a lot of potential there. Nevermind he is a LSer, a replacement for Dearth.

    I love how people come with the obviously scewed judgements to make their favorites look better. I am not saying Davis would be a bad pick, I have him as my 6th choice for the Jets. But lets at least try to impartial here.
     
  6. NYJ1012

    NYJ1012 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    0
    the draft in a nutshell...

    perfectly put
     
  7. nyjets2823

    nyjets2823 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    1
    yeah but and if dbrick and leinart are on the board i would def take leinart.... if i see one more dbrick>leinart im going to go crazy!!!
     
    #47 nyjets2823, Apr 22, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 31, 2005
  8. deviljets7

    deviljets7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,535
    Likes Received:
    315
    You hit the nail right no the head here. I think its possible that they try to trade down if it's D'Brick and/or Leinart at #4, however I can't see anyone other than D'Brick, Leinart, or Mario at #4.
     
  9. KleckoMawaeChrebet

    KleckoMawaeChrebet New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    C'mon... consistency is about having playmakers???**Stop.**Consistency is about good blocking, good tackling and good coaching.**That's why teams make the playoffs.**

    Why this obsession with the playmakers when are offense was not even functional last year?**We couldn't open holes for runners, couldn't protect the passer, couldn't stop turning the ball over... we couldn't even get the center - QB exchange right!!!**Where does a playmaker fit into that?
     

Share This Page