I guess they are finding some items on the other server or another source. Question now is if all proper protocols were followed. One thing I don't like is Clinton's communication director acting as if it is no big deal, calling it nonsense. Sorry but some questionable steps were taken and it involves classified documents, that is far from nonsense.
The Hildabeast moniker I think is pretty funny (even though I'm a lib) and I don't think it originated with the OP. I first saw it posted by Huskersfan but correct me if I'm wrong. What I don't like is the Fox News, Sean Hannity and so many of the Breitbart links which are inaccurate sources. They assume guilt before innocence if it's someone they dislike. They call out Hillary as a liar and say PP is a disgusting org that should be defunded without clear proof or allowing the investigative process to be completed. Irresponsible.
Just look at that Sean Hannity posting from Fox News that starts this thread. It's a hatchet job.. I don't believe CNN is as you say the Clinton Network, but that's a good line. They're more in the middle. I (of course) like MSNBC but at times they're almost as ridiculous as Fox. I watch all three. Breitbart is a joke. When I post from lib sites I always say they're lib sites and not try to say they're not prejudiced.
I can't stand Hannity. He isn't entertaining at all. At least blowhards like Rush are entertaining. Hannity is a bore.
Rush is unlistenable unless you just like his bombast. Shooting his mouth off but what he says is total bullshit. Funny that Hannity kissed Trump's ass the other night after his boss Roger Ailes told them to lighten up on the Donald after the Megan Kelly fiasco. He let a lot slide incl. some of Trump's liberal POVs. I think that Hannity is the stupidest guy on TV.
You claiming any other sources as inaccurate is funny. It doesn't slant your way it is inaccurate, got it. Anyone that hasn't realized by now that just about every news outlet slants either the left or the right is blind. Tell me which one gives an even reporting of the news? Do you think that Fox News is lying about them finding top secret documents on the server?
They are calling her a liar before the facts and proof. And giving it huge coverage and bringing on guests who trash her. They do sometimes have a counterpoint like with Juan Williams and Kirsten Powers (both good debaters). But they are assuming guilt before innocence. And their fans (they get big ratings as compared to MSNBC who get almost nothing) are influenced by their coverage. O'Reilly has his own cottage industry. To me CNN has the most balanced coverage. They aren't out to get Hillary like Fox but they are covering the story.
its always funny to me that the hyper liberals seem to know more about Fox News than their supposed target audience. It makes me wonder who is really influenced by their coverage... Fox News is doing better with ratings because there is a democratic president btw. Its like WWE wrestling: they always get better ratings when there is a "bad guy" holding the title. It gets boring watching your "good guy" try to hang onto relevancy. Nobody wants to watch hour long segments of a news show defending their president when they aren't doing to well themselves. much more enjoyable to watch a bash fest. plus you have to factor in that if your "side's" president isn't doing so well, its a decent strategy to simply pick apart the other side's argument. So Fox News would get viewers like pclfan just so he can bitch on TGG. Get us a Republican president again and MSNBCs ratings will go up considerably. even with the boobs they have on there now, ie. Rachel Maddow, Sharpton, etc.
First of all I watch Fox News enough that I can have I think a good opinion on it. Not every show on MSNBC is moderated by Al Sharpton which is a joke. But lefty leaning esp Chris Hayes, Rachel, etc. Rachel at least is pretty funny. She can talk 20 minutes straight and hold your interest, is great at making faces and her jokes at the expense of the Conservatives are pretty good. And she doesn't cut off her guests like most of the Fox News moderators and contributors are obviously coached up to do. But as O'Reilly etc. says all the time, "nobody" watches MSNBC. They just fired some of their afternoon people like Ed and those kids who were on (and not that good) at 3 pm.
Yep, CNN is in the middle, middle of the liberal sites is about it. Looks like about 90% of the major outlets are liberal.
Can you be honest for once. CNN gives the liberal slant you like, it is not balanced coverage. You calling out those other shows means nothing because you counter with CNN slanted views.
- I don't know about LTJF, but I would describe Hillary as LGBT. . . . Bill Clinton to Gennifer Flowers: "Hillary's eaten more p**sy that I have." ... --> funny how that little "investigated by the FBI" thingy got lost in the sauce what with all the project-and-deflect partisan whining that ensued afther the OP. That said, why anyone would even consider throwing their support behind this calculating sow over (e.g. a Bernie Sanders) is beyond me.......outside of blind, partisan sheep.
I don't consider myself a liar. And Hillary is NG until it's proven she did it. Fox News says she is guilty before proven innocent. I didn't think it was supposed to work like that. Even though the server she gave to DOJ with all emails deleted.
Yeah but imo the guy is so far out and crazy-nasty I don't see it. To me he even gives the right wing a bad name.Well, if you love to hear good insults of the left (and really far out) there's always Mark Levin and Michael Savage. And of course there's that old favorite Sarah Palin who grabs huge fees (not Clintonesque but pretty high) for saying terrible things about liberals, too. These people are smart: they know there's a huge market based on hatred of the left. And they're profiting from it.
I wonder how Hillery liked the book on emailing, Send: Why People Email So Badly and How to Do It Better, specifically the chapter on how to get rid of emails that could send you to jail.
Look, Hillary is an attorney and probably a skilled one. So I have no illusions that anything she might have done illegal she was unaware of. And this email scandal kind of fits the mode of her husband Slick Willy and the way the Clintons operate. Tricky and on the borderline of being illegal if not illegal. No wonder Joe Biden's son wanted him to run for Pres just so another Clinton wouldn't get in the White House. She has a lot to answer for and just blanket denials aren't good enough. You just have to wonder why someone as intelligent as she is would make such blunders and then do the worst thing imaginable for a candidate: lie about it. But unlike the Conservative news media and lightweights like Carly Fiorina, Hillary deserves her day in court. And should only be judged on the facts alone and not presumed guilty. She could like Tom Brady get away with it because of legal maneuvers, but let's wait and see. Like the right electorate the left is sick and tired of these kinds of things going on, too. Hence the popularity of off beat candidates like Trump and Bernie.
