The ranking seems perfect since the people who made it wanted others to read and discuss it. So in that way they definitely nailed it.
I don't care about ESPN's power ranking i'm sure we're going to be better than they are giving us credit for.
If your team can get four starters in the draft, that should tell you something about the strength of your team.
Actually it makes sense since they are all replacing people who left as fa or in Revis case traded. Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Bottom line is we're last until we prove we don't deserve to be last & the only way to do that is to WIN!!! PERIOD
Baaaahahahahaha! Jets at 32! Dead last in the league, despite finishing better last year with a completely banged up decimated roster and Sanchez playing like dogshit! What a fucking joke. These guys really go out of their way to shit on the Jets. There are definitely worse teams. We at least have a top 10 (probably top 5) defense. All the offense has to do is not fuck up as much as last year. Last in the league my asshole. Fuck the media. It's going to be hilarious when they prove the haters wrong.
With that logic we should be the 9th worst team and the worst team should be KC. We proved last year we weren't the worst team in the NFL.
Where exactly did we downgrade from a coaching or player standpoint? in my opinion, Morningwood may just be our biggest improvement. biggest question, what type of QB will we have compared to 2012? would be hard to downgrade at QB from 2012. i just don't see us playing worse than last year, barring a crushing rash of injuries. ESPN is just looking for a reaction as per usual.
An example of power rankings done well and without bias: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap10...after-2013-nfl-draft?icampaign=ATL_newsdriver
Being last is not a problem. These projections are barely educated guesses. The Colts started last year at 32 and ended up in the playoffs. Win or lose, the future is promising. #loseforclowney
I miss the days when the only sports news of the day was on the network news for about 5 minutes. Now there's too much sports news - it's news for the sake of newspeople and not real news. Then again, I remember when I first watched Sportscenter and it was awesome to have a 1 HOUR news program everyday multiple times/day. ESPN people were more straight shooters then, not the bloviating idiots of today.
Over-exposure can really damage a sport. Baseball was riding high when ESPN started the all-baseball all-the-time business in the mid 80's. They expanded on another big phenomenon in Fantasy Baseball in the process, feeding off of FB managers wanting to get their players results in real time. There comes a point though where that kind of over-exposure takes some of the magic out of the game. How many "back-back-back's" can you watch before homeruns become a boring every day event?
