Denver trade

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by CmartinHOF, Apr 4, 2006.

  1. hotcoles87123

    hotcoles87123 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    0
    it would cost more to trade up. Leinart at 2 would cost about the same if not more than the 15th, 22nd and 29th combined... signing bonus anyway.
     
  2. smittyf350

    smittyf350 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    188
    Likes Received:
    0
    if denver would do this trade if mario was available. which i dont know if there that crazy to. we could really turn this thing around real quick. look at what we could pick up

    15. justice
    22. williams
    29. mangold
    35. watson. i think this guy stock has dropped a little would be a steal in the 2nd round.

    what else would we need. a pass rushing OLB. that would be it really. every other pick would be for depth.

    but in all reality i dont think denver would make this trade. i do think mario will be there at 4 though. the saints have two really good DE why add another. unless there doing something with charles grant
     
  3. dwalsh

    dwalsh 2006 TGG.com Rookie of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,735
    Likes Received:
    6
    Pick #4 = 1800
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Pick #15 = 1050
    Pick #22 = 780

    Jets give up 1800 points and get 1830 back. fair trade according the the draft pick value chart. http://www.thehuddlereport.com/NickelPackage/tradevaluechart.htm
     
    #23 dwalsh, Apr 4, 2006
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2006
  4. AlioTheFool

    AlioTheFool Spiveymaniac

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,601
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wouldn't even blink before accepting this deal. I wouldn't make the same picks as many of you are suggesting, but I would take one of those first rounders, and swap it with another team for their #1 next year.

    I really want a 2 pick first round next year, since I don't want to take any of the QBs this year. I would rather try what we have now, and if we aren't convinced we have the guy here, we use the two 1's next year to go up to the top and grab up Quinn. And if we have the now and future guy already, we will still have an extra first rounder next year to address whatever needs we find over the course of this year.
     
  5. WayneChrebet

    WayneChrebet New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    1
    well said.
     
  6. The Dude

    The Dude New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    We would need to get more than 15 and 22, if you remember, we traded 12 and 22 AND a 4th rounder for 4 so I would expect a 4th rounder from Denver as well, if not a 3rd.
     
  7. TDforTatum26

    TDforTatum26 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    For Super Mario.
     
  8. vilmaisabeast

    vilmaisabeast New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    0
    If we did get those picks i would do the same except take either Lawson(if there) Wimbley(if there) or Carpenter with the second Round pick.
     
  9. typeOnegative13NY

    typeOnegative13NY Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    14,800
    Likes Received:
    4,684
    at this point we need a game changing playmaker. This way we can groom him trade him away like we did Abe.
     
  10. SuppaMan

    SuppaMan New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    IMO = In my opinion :wink:
     
  11. vilmatic

    vilmatic Active Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    12
    IMO you stay at the top if and only if you want to draft a QB. OTherwise this is the sort f deal that benefits both teams and I would heartily approve.
     
  12. typeOnegative13NY

    typeOnegative13NY Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    14,800
    Likes Received:
    4,684
    I don't know,we could really use our future RB from the top. IMO,if there was a chance to get Bush,we stay,otherwise.....
     
  13. Cotchery=future

    Cotchery=future New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good point... where would we get the money to sign all these guys?
     
  14. chad2coles

    chad2coles Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2003
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    336
    I'm not sure you can pass on Williams at 15. There's a good chance he won't make it to 22. This is what I'd do...

    15) deangelo williams
    22) bobby carpenter
    29) nick mangold
    34) best available RT - maybe Colledge?

    Our O-Line becomes very good and young, we get the second best running back in the draft, and a LB that Mangini likes. Then we have an early 3rd round pick, a late one, and 2 4th round picks to fill the rest of the team out.
     
  15. 28rogerblaze51

    28rogerblaze51 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    3,126
    Likes Received:
    1
    If we can get mario williams at 4 get him, if he is gone then i would do that trade.
     
  16. MattMan

    MattMan New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,222
    Likes Received:
    0
    IMO=In My Opinion
     
  17. MattMan

    MattMan New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,222
    Likes Received:
    0
    beat me to it:up:
     

Share This Page