no. hillary had a private server setup with a shit load of classified emails on it. the other two used private email, but never setup an unsecured bootleg server in a closet of a bathroom. I think the news of hillary saying she wanted the private server to avoid foil requests could be damaging to her. Shows intent, doesn't it?
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/02/19/colin-powell-emails-hillary-clinton-424187.html Its too bad that its open season on the Clintons
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/02/19/colin-powell-emails-hillary-clinton-424187.html Those emails weren't always top secret. That sound you hear is the sound of the men grinding axes..
But wait.. there's more.... http://www.forbes.com/sites/charles...s-clinton-rather-than-nails-her/#79d14a0a2c7d
Not to pile on but for the Benghazi Banditos, here's a little perspective. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Beirut_barracks_bombings Funny, but you don't hear anyone screaming "murderer" since it was President Reagan who was caught napping on this one. 250 is greater than 4 unless you're a GOP loyalist with damnesia. Hang Hillary for 4 deaths while giving Reagan a pass on 250.. check
so, we have dueling links...Better enjoy this before the brave new order takes over and there will only be ONE opinion allowed. The one that aligns with Trump..
according to many on here Reagan was an awful president, so not really something to strive for - is it? or is he a hero now that it fits a narrative?
I do despise that smelly pirate hooker, and despite Trump being an awful candidate I prefer him over Hillary. I actually prefer Hillary over Bernie though and I think Bernie would wipe the floor with Trump. So I guess I'd prefer that the smoke continue to billow until after the election. That seems like the best thing that could happen.
There was a time in this country when having your own opinion WAS an entitlement. I'm sure Herr Trump will make short work of that "entitlement" right after he's sworn in..
Kinda like that entire "the good old days" thing. It was only good for one segment of the population. For the rest of us, not so much. All in the point of view. I will never see things the way you do and visa versa.
Every election cycle we have every GOP POTUS candidate line up and wrap himself in the cloak of Ronald Reagan so obviously not only is RR a hero, but practically a saint in conservative circles. Having lived thru the Reagan presidency (and actually voting for him over Carter), he wasn't awful, but he wasn't the GOAT either. To his credit, he knew how to compromise with an hostile Congress and got things done. Compromise these days is heresy..
So apparently bernie and trump have agreed to debate in California after hillary declined. this will be interesting if it actually happens. seems like a dangerous move by trump since he's hoping to land some of the bernie vote. Bernie can unload on him while trump tries to tread lightly.
Wow. If Sanders and Trump wind up on stage in California debating and it gets carried nationally Hillary may get swept away in the aftermath. She has no good outcomes there unless they both look like idiots, which is unlikely since Sanders will be on idiot alert. Let's say Sanders does really well and suddenly the polls in California are 60/40 Sanders over Hillary. That's a total disaster for her campaign and it will be widely portrayed as such. Alternately if Trump brushes Sanders off like a flea, which is always possible, then the California polls for the General may suddenly look much more Trumpish than they did before. Hillary has to find some way to keep Sanders off that stage. She can't even join in because that would turn into her taking fire from both other candidates. She should have just debated Sanders and that may be what her best outcome is right now. Keep Sanders off stage with Trump at all costs.
