Could the passing game be better without Holmes?

I think we will be better without Holmes. He is a cancer and just not a #1 WR. He made his name off one catch in the SB. Pittsburgh dumped him because he was a DOUCHE!!! If he was great they would have kept him, but he was easily replaceable just as he is now!!

 

You know, we always saw game that sanchez would just lock on holmes and forget about anyone else

now he will spread the ball more, at least it's what it looks like
Chaz played great in these last 2 games, hill is back kicking ass
Besides it's not like holmes was such an amazing receiver

 

Holmes is an overrated #2 receiver who is also a team killer

We are better off without him.

 

I just don't want to see Holmes back. I think we are better without him.

 

i'll bet that mcelroy and holmes would do a lot better than sanchez with holmes. holmes can catch, but sanchez can't throw. don't let an off-day by luck fool you.

until sanchez can beat a top-tier team, like the pats , sf, texans, without a good game by the defense, i remain unfazed.

how many games has brady won while his defense played like crap?

don't make the mistake of thinking sanchez can carry a team. hmy:

 

I don't think it's actually better without Holmes. He's a nice piece of our core, but our young guys are now stepping up, which is great. I think we would have eventually clicked with Holmes in as well.