Again, you're missing JetBlue's point. Asking someone if they think it's right that someone should be shot for jaywalking starts off with a faulty presumption. _
I thought what he said about people that Jaywalk is absolutely incorrect. Judging by Jetblue's opinion on Jaywalkers to me it seemed as if they are a threat to this planet that deserve major justice. That's why I asked him that question.
You continue to use a false presumption, that he was jaywalking. He wasn't jaywalking. Therefore asking if it's right that someone should get shot for jaywalking is illogical. Is it right that someone should get shot for eating twinkies? See? _
Not sure if you saw it but did you read the article I just posted on this thread in regards to the witnesses? Few eyewitnesses mentioned that the cop told Brown to get on the sidewalk. He could have been jaywalking.
Oh geez. And he could have been eating twinkies. Do you think it's right that you could get shot for eating twinkies? _
Of course not, but if the cop that killed Michael Brown saw me eating Twinkies and he wanted to harass me about it, I might get shot. Hopefully he doesn't aim for the head first.
What the fuck? I think as long as you don't charge at the cop after he tells you to put down the twinkie you'll be just fine. Over a dozen people have corroborated this story now. Where is your ridiculous narrative coming from?
According to the eyewitnesses on the link I posted, Michael Brown never charged at the cop. If I told the cop I have one more piece to eat and ate right then and there - you think the cop would try and come at me like he did according to those eyewitnesses? There are many sides of the story.
If you don't want to read what the other witnesses said - and how I applied it to what I was saying you can fuck off. It's all about the cop and how he reacted in the situation. Way to be a close-minded fuck.
No. The one that was with him was listed first and as far as I'm concerned he has zero credibility after the autopsy came out. So if that's the first one in the list I'm done with it.
You failed to read the entire article that includes an interview on national TV. I should ask the same thing.
Because the article is obviously bullshit if they start with a known liar. I don't lend credence to it at all. What known liar have I given credibility to here?
Maybe the article wanted to start off with the person that was actually with him at the scene of the crime? How about the lady that was right there at the scene of the crime and had live interviews with legitimate stations? As I said there are other people out there with different stories. We'll see what happens.
