Did you notice those parts that said Update:, Update 2:, Update 3:, etc.? They came after the initial article and do not have dates on them except one that says August 18th. If you Google news for Piaget Crenshaw and sort by date you will see the earliest mention of 8/16/14. Don't tell me to argue with facts when you are the one that started talking about the officers mental state. You have no idea of the officers mental state yet you state "I think" multiple times and state the officer "lost it". I also never stated my "version" was the only possibility but for you to dismiss it as "not reality" shows that you have no intent of looking at both sides. I don't argue with facts "that people are pushing on me", I read, I think, I come to my own conclusions. I also know that it is a fact that people in an effort to conform in a situation such as this will listen to the reports and adjust their "story" to fit, that is why we initially had many people saying he was shot in the back when he never was, it was people passing along what they heard from others as first hand information. Is it so far out there to believe once that narrative passed then the next one where he was giving up or getting on his knees was also passed along as first hand when in fact it was not in all cases? Once all the information as to gun powder residue, the way he fell, the distance between the parties when he was shot and all verifiable eye witnesses are known we will have enough to go on. Until that time don't act as if your "I thinks" trump anyone else processing of information.
That's what BWay does, he manufactures bullshit to fit his preconceived narrative. Then accuses others of promoting preconceived notions. He is a total fraud. _
Going back to my other post where I stated many change their story based upon hearing from others. I can not think of a situation where it would be advantageous to pull someone through your car window by the neck while you are seated in the car yet we have 2 people saying, "She first saw a struggle between Brown and Wilson, with Brown trying to push away from the police car and Wilson trying to pull the teenager into the vehicle." and "She saw Wilson try to pull Brown into the squad car." Now of course I am not saying that he absolutely did not try to pull Brown in the car by the neck but maybe someone could explain why he would do this.
clearly the powers of being a cop offsets the complete lack of leverage a normal human being would have in grabbing a 300 lb man by the neck and pulling him into a car while in a seated position.
Something doesn't sound right from what I heard. Why would a cop pull a person into his car like some witness's are saying?
To arrest him? To cause harm? We don't know the full extent of the story and to be honest, not knowing the truth at this juncture is bullshit - someone is hiding something in my opinion. This isn't Darren Wilson's first time causing issues such as this one - he was fired from Jennings, MO for pretty much doing something similar. http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...c796f0-2a45-11e4-8593-da634b334390_story.html A habitual offender?
My response was a sarcastic retort to another poster and I have no idea what the context is for your question. If you swung from a fluorescent lamp, imitation crabmeat? _
Yeah, after seeing what these cops are doing against peaceful protesters - I don't believe their story one bit and I don't believe anyone willing to protect those officers.
Holy shit did you read the fucking article that YOU posted? The small city of Jennings, Mo., had a police department so troubled, and with so much tension between white officers and black residents, that the city council finally decided to disband it. Everyone in the Jennings police department was fired. New officers were brought in to create a credible department from scratch. That was three years ago. One of the officers who worked in that department, and lost his job along with everyone else, was a young man named Darren Wilson. Officials say Wilson kept a clean record without any disciplinary action. Robert Orr, the former Jennings police chief who retired in 2010, said of Wilson: “He was a good officer with us. There was no disciplinary action.” WTF dude? _
Most of the protesters are fine in fact are even helping the police. We will never know 100% what really happen. To many people are so quick to pull the race card.
Yes 2 of my brothers were cops but not sure if you're serious about your question. If not, haha good one. If serious, dude I don't know what to say to you. _
Yeah it's really not a race issue, it's about social class. The Media is making it a Race issue. White kids get shot by Black cops too - it's about police brutality and getting away with murder - literally. Read the story on Dillon Taylor.
NO NO NO--that's not what you said. You didn't even read the fucking article that YOU posted. Wilson didn't get fired for "pretty much doing something similar", the ENTIRE Police Department was disbanded and EVERYONE got fired, not just Wilson. He didn't do anything to get fired, certainly not because of a physical altercation. He was NEVER sited for ANY issues. Dude, stop being an ass and making inflammatory editorial comments about an article that you didn't even read. You're weak stance looks stupid enough as it is without you posting pure bullshit to back it up. _
