Assuming we can't resign Edwards this year?

Discussion in 'Draft' started by wildaces, Feb 11, 2011.

  1. inSANITy

    inSANITy Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,808
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont care what you say. Flying is physically impossible
     
  2. wildaces

    wildaces Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok, but I never mentioned anything about drafting in the 1st rd. I tried implying that I didn't know anything about him, and that included I had no idea where he was projected to go.

    I did see one site that projected him as a 2-3 rd prospect.
     
  3. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dunno Braylon and Holmes both have enough headcaseness/egos to come out and ask for top 5 WR money.

    Im sure it wont happen, but would you really be shocked if either of these guys said they want contracts like Brandon Marshall ?
     
  4. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    And what production has been seen to warrant Brandon Marshall money?

    It would shock me, because both of them aren't top 5 WRs.
     
  5. JohnnyThaJet

    JohnnyThaJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    6,282
    Likes Received:
    1
    Any chance we sign back a guy like Stuckey if we lose Edwards? He couldn't cost us too much, has experience on the team (somewhat) and Id say if we signed him, we should go and draft a guy like Greg Little, Terrence Tolliver , or Darvin Adams (if he bulks up a bit) to have a tall WR with good hands that can help Sanchez with the loss of Braylon.

    WR Roster would be:

    Holmes
    J-Co
    Stuckey
    One of Little, Tolliver, or Adams.

    Just a theory.Not to bad IMO.
     
    #25 JohnnyThaJet, Feb 15, 2011
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2011
  6. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    Sanchez liked stuckey as a CHECK DOWN OPTION in his 1st year so I'm not opposed to that.

    I didn't like the Edwards trade because of the timing. A 1st year kid does not need a new vertical threat when he's so raw. He needs his possession guys like Cotch and Stuckey, but it doesn't matter now.

    With Stuckey back, the Jets have their slot guy.

    The really nasty business decision? Sign both Holmes and Edwards, get stuckey and trade cotch for a 4th rounder that can escalate into a 3rd.
     
  7. JohnnyThaJet

    JohnnyThaJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    6,282
    Likes Received:
    1
    Personally, I think Stuckey is great but Cotch is a team leader and clutch. If we are going to make a superbowl run we need him.

    Im not opposed to your idea but would just have a bad feeling about it.
     
  8. nyjetsrule

    nyjetsrule Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    10,379
    Likes Received:
    7
    that would be preferable, because lets be real J-co isn't built for the slot. We don't have enough receptions to go around and it would be another way to cut salary. A bunch of us said it the offseason Sanchez was drafted, Stuckey is the perfect slot receiver and he isn't built for the outside. That said J-co is the better talent, he is the better receiver and a fan favorite, so it would be hard to make that move. But as you said, crude bussiness decision? keep Holmes and Edwards and move on from J-co, its whats best for Mark and the Jets.
     
  9. joeklecko

    joeklecko New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,465
    Likes Received:
    0
    No way I'd trade Cotchery. He has been money for the Jets (especially vs the Pats), and I believe he is a popular player and leader. I'd be happy with Stuckey back, but not at the expense of Cotchery.
     
  10. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Id be absolutely furious if we got a 4th rounder for Cotchery.

    Getting a 2nd rounder for him id be more than content with, but a 4th thats just garbage.

    Hell worst case scenario id say hes more than worth an early 3rd. If I was a fan of any other team and found out we were getting Jco for an early 3rd id be ecstatic.
     
  11. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trades have to work out for both teams.

    Go give the argument to a GM how cotch is worth a 2nd, he'll hang up on you midway through the pitch.

    I said escalates into a 3rd for a reason - he just might have another 80 catch season in him.

    I get it, you're a Jets fan so the glasses make you want a 2nd. Real life makes it a 4th. He has a much value as Rhodes did last year. So if a 7th is added I'm cool with that too.
     
  12. LeonNYJ

    LeonNYJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,009
    Likes Received:
    835
    IDK why, but I laughed.
     

Share This Page