the 2 things aren't at all comparable. The discussion is about retaliating against those hacked into and shut down american businesses last week. fjf wonders why people want to attack the messenger for that. I mentioned Clinton's emails but the truth is idk for sure if the people are one in the same but its still much different than your example. Trump's tax return was acquired legally. it is illegal to hack into the servers of an organization
Maybe I missed something. I thought the conversation was about wiki leaks. Is someone saying wiki leaks did the ddos attack?
Btw, regarding Hillary's email getting hacked... it's also illegal to store classified material on an unsecured and unclassified system, but that's none of my business.
No, i thought i only quoted the part where cman was calling for wiki to be hacked. Sorry if i didn't make that clear.
One more thing, maybe if the media did their fucking jobs like they used to do there wouldn't be a need for a wiki leaks. Instead, as is shown by wiki leaks, they're now just part of the campaign - helping push the narrative.
New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" But hey it's the Russians messing with "our democratic process!" Sure, if that's what this sham is called....
I saw an ABC poll yesterday that showed a 12 point Clinton lead over Trump. When I drilled into the poll it showed that it had polled 9 percent more democrats than republicans. I know there are more registered D's than R's, but it's not 9 percent. So why would they do this? here's the poll: http://www.langerresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/1184a12016ElectionTrackingNo1.pdf
that's the one he supposedly kissed without asking? have you ever asked a girl before you kissed her? dumb shit.
Are you implying it's a conspiracy? Seriously, out of all the polls out there, you're going to get some that skew Democratic like this one and some that skew Republican like the one that has Trump up by 2. That's why professional stats guys take the average of the polls.
