Trump calls for drug test before debate It's a given that they pump a lot of shit into her before each debate or public appearance, especially after what happened on 9/11.
For those who are voting based on ideals for candidates with no chance to win, why not write in a vote for George Washington? Is there much difference? I'm not saying you're wrong, I'd vote for anyone who I thought had an outside shot that was closer to my ideals and was willing to vote GJ had he made the debate stage. I'm just curious if you see a real difference aside from the obvious dead guy part. The only wrong vote IMO is not to vote.
Writing in someone would be better than voting for Johnson, he's just a stooge that's horrendously unprepared or qualified to become president, the only people voting for him are ones that are protest voting and of the two most well-known protest votes he's at least not a loon like Jill Stein. I'd respect writing in Jeb Bush or any other Republican clown that got thumped in the primary more than voting for either one of those two tbh.
your posts have been filled with misogynistic comments in these threads, but i figured it was out of political frustration. however, if you actually believe what you wrote here, then you're just a dipshit.
Instead of going right to the standard d strategy of name-calling, maybe you could actually discuss what you believe was wrong with my comments. Did you actually listen to the video or did you just take the media marching orders that Trump anally rapes 10 year olds?
Donald Trump 'grabbed me and went for the lips', says ninth accuser https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...mp-sexual-misconduct-allegations-cathy-heller
Job interview nerves at the debate by a non politician candidate. He has always been the boss who made the decisions until now.
In May, the DNC was discussing putting out a fake craigslist ad from Trump that included this: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803 All these women who suddenly decided to come out 3 weeks before the election are probably totally legit though.
Things need to change from the current 2 party system, the current system just continually recycles the some hacks, the only thing that changes are their names. The only way it changes is if a 3rd party starts getting some traction but with the Dems and Reps doing everything they can to stop those 3rd parties, it is a total uphill battle. Now if all those people who want to vote 3rd party actually do, then there is a chance Johnson could come close to or exceed Ross Perot's 19% from 1992. This could then give 3rd party candidates some more exposure and a better chance in future elections. I'm not delusional thinking Johnson has a chance to win but if my vote helps toward that exposure that maybe makes people think a little deeper about the elections in the future I am willing to put my vote toward someone that is an outsider to the 2 parties and is actually a good choice. I can't see how anyone could vote for Clinton or Trump and feel they made the right choice.
Have you bothered to read any of Johnson's policy positions? If the candidate with the most executive office experience is unqualified, then what are the other 2 candidates?
