What they did in college is irrelevant. At the pro level, I've seen Bradford be unable to recognize blitzes or find a hot read, and its reflected in his numbers. Seriously, your argument that Vick is a better big play threat than Newton is the fact that the Eagles have a better record than the Panthers? Seriously???
0-7. No win left on a tough schedule for the Dolphins! Suck for LucK!!!!!!! and RAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! beating the Saints!! and the Colts......tanking the season. We need an investigation.
Newton (rookie) 60.3% completion vs Bradford 53% completion. So, what have you seen that makes you believe Newton is not accurate?
Fuck Miami, sucks....they again get out for lead and only to play liek shit in the 2nd half. I really wanted the Giants to lose but thanks Miami for being good awful.
Someone ban this faggot already. I don't think he's added a single thing in all of his 20 some odd posts.
I don't think that Newton is inaccurate, but I think that Bradford is more accurate. I think that Bradford's completion % is artificially low because his o-line and receivers are awful (in addition to his aforementioned problems making pre-snap reads.) As I've said before, overall I would definitely take Newton over Bradford overall.
Yeah ban that piece of shit. His contribution is going to be a weekly: Suck for Luck Lets lose. Too bad his parents didn't abort him.
I've seen your argument and largely agree with you (clearly), I just think Cam is incredibly accurate. Trey Wingo was talking about how accurate Cam is earlier (and Cam's line is pretty shitty too and he honestly only has one, albeit outstanding, receiver, so I don't necessarilly agree with your handicap).
Are you a woman or a 12 year old boy? Let me save you some time- copy and paste these exclamation marks next time: !!!!!!!111111!!!!!!1111!!!!!!!!1111!!!!!
