Separate names with a comma.
Btw I think having the cynic pose here is a pussy copout. Not calling anyone in particular names here, of course. Just a general observation.
I think anyone who thinks too hard about why someone else would have someone on ignore, and cares to call it a pussy copout, is very much in...
Perhaps you took what I meant to say you're slimy. I didn't say that. I just said you ain't got shit. And that you posted an insult in a slimy...
I also question her judgment. As I said above. But she is not guilty until proven innocent to the satisfaction of all the reactionary jackasses...
According to former Secretary Powell, Ms. Rice did have emails on the server of her top aids that were classified after the fact. And Powell had...
As most know here I have abysmal on ignore. He resents this very much. I assumed from your comment you did not hurt yourself, so since the...
I think what Juan Williams said pretty much is my point. No surprise you think it a given that "the world" feels a certain way. The way you...
You missed where I have not ruled out that she may in fact have done something significantly wrong. I never said no one can prove anything. As...
You have yet to post a single thing that refutes what I have said on the merits. Figures. You have nothing but empty cynicism. You wallow in...
And I think you can go F yourself.
In case your were wondering, I do read and watch Fox News from time to time: Spreading baseless venom about Hillary Clinton and her emails By...
So, people with cunts are what? Should be disqualified from running for president? What is the relevance of your observation?
Again, there is no evidence that the emails she had on her server were classified when she got them. That law does not say that you are violating...
You are not even a fraction as clever as you think you are being. Try another line, Mr. Cynic.
Faker.
Again, show me that your caveat there of MOST PROBABLY is no more than that. And she had a legitimate reason to protect her private emails. You...
First of all the mere fact she had a private server is not evidence of malfeasance or evil intent. The law does not require public officials to...
You claim to be this even handed cynic. But essentially all the time your posts take a pro right wing slant. You are a faker.
To you it does because it assumes facts not in evidence that are self serving to your position.
That assumes she had reason to believe that she was putting security below convenience as a concern. IT requires a knowledge of technical issues...
