Separate names with a comma.
You're right. But you didn't really explain what is significant about the last 15 years, so I ignored this constraint.
No, actually someone DID say ignore the numbers.
You missed my point entirely: Fitzpatrick is Smith's competition on THIS team, with a few advocating that he should be the starter. It's a...
This wasn't really a response to the post, which mentioned that games are meaningful...to someone, somewhere. Jobs are won and lost. But, I get...
If the arguments against Smith were based primarily on statistics I would agree. But they aren't. They are mostly based on memories: he had three...
As easy as it is to go to NFL.com (hell, I posted a link) to verify Smith's ACTUAL numbers that's as hard as it is for these Smith Haters to...
sure, I agree, assuming, of course, that those weapons make it to and remain on the field and that the OL additions play significantly better than...
I don't support Smith "unconditionally". I support him. If he performs poorly NOW THAT HE HAS WEAPONS AND A-GAP PROTECTION, I will be asking for...
Then why would any Smith detractor want to ignore numbers? And how else can one objectively measure something without using the real number...
Sorry, but this is just plain stupid. Numbers are objective measures. So, cannot be "flawed". And if you're going to ignore numbers then what are...
Ryan Fitzpatrick's numbers his first two years as a starter (noting that Fitzpatrick's first two years as a starter came in his 4th and 5th years...
not actually MY argument...but sure, anything positive is meaningless.
I think those stats have been compiled from "SmithHaters.com" because NFL.com says something completely different: 97.9 rating during the Harvin...
Says you. According to Chan Gailey, "he's the starter and we never considered a competition..." They have several choices: 1. they could have...
Actually, the record (what you've posted on this discussion) says that you ARE invested in his failure, since you're arguing with me, who is...
SMITH IS THE STARTER until he isn't. The (new) coaching staff looked at the alternatives, critiqued his performance, and decided he's the best...
So, really, the sum total of arguments against Smith have his 2013 season stats as their buttress. Actually, many people have brought up 2013,...
last time I checked ONE is a subset of SOME. Are we really STILL talking about 2013? Is that what you are staking your present assessment of...
Unless they actually WIN some games... But, to paraphrase Allen Iverson: "we're talking about 2013, his rookie year, with receivers that couldn't...
So, if he played badly during those games, you'd be all over him. But because it doesn't fit YOUR criterion of "meaningful" it's to be ignored....
